Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
Shadow Wizard
  • 175k
  • 33
  • 437
  • 864
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

For a background of the problem, see this other questionthis other question.


Feature Proposal

This feature proposal is reduce posting of "linking hit-and-runs" answers.

An answer is a "linking hit-and-run" if links occupy >= 15% of the body and the character count if lower or equal to 200.

If an answer is qualified as a "linking hit-and-run", one of the following actions could be implemented:

  • Warning Only: Warn the user that his answer is a "linking hit-and-run" and considered bad etiquette on this website to post that kind of answer and that posting such answer might incur negative reputation for that very reason.

  • Warning and CW: Warn the user that his answer is a "linking hit-and-run" and that it will be marked as community wiki unless he adds more body content. If the user decides to post the answer anyway, the answer is marked community wiki and no reputation is gained.

  • Deny: Outright deny posting the answer.

This should reduce the number of users posting small and cryptic answers linking to an other site.

I think a change is required as this has become a community problem and this trend cannot be reversed on a case-by-case down-voting of those types of answers. New users have no idea that this is frowned upon which is why this problem needs to be solved systematically.

For a background of the problem, see this other question.


Feature Proposal

This feature proposal is reduce posting of "linking hit-and-runs" answers.

An answer is a "linking hit-and-run" if links occupy >= 15% of the body and the character count if lower or equal to 200.

If an answer is qualified as a "linking hit-and-run", one of the following actions could be implemented:

  • Warning Only: Warn the user that his answer is a "linking hit-and-run" and considered bad etiquette on this website to post that kind of answer and that posting such answer might incur negative reputation for that very reason.

  • Warning and CW: Warn the user that his answer is a "linking hit-and-run" and that it will be marked as community wiki unless he adds more body content. If the user decides to post the answer anyway, the answer is marked community wiki and no reputation is gained.

  • Deny: Outright deny posting the answer.

This should reduce the number of users posting small and cryptic answers linking to an other site.

I think a change is required as this has become a community problem and this trend cannot be reversed on a case-by-case down-voting of those types of answers. New users have no idea that this is frowned upon which is why this problem needs to be solved systematically.

For a background of the problem, see this other question.


Feature Proposal

This feature proposal is reduce posting of "linking hit-and-runs" answers.

An answer is a "linking hit-and-run" if links occupy >= 15% of the body and the character count if lower or equal to 200.

If an answer is qualified as a "linking hit-and-run", one of the following actions could be implemented:

  • Warning Only: Warn the user that his answer is a "linking hit-and-run" and considered bad etiquette on this website to post that kind of answer and that posting such answer might incur negative reputation for that very reason.

  • Warning and CW: Warn the user that his answer is a "linking hit-and-run" and that it will be marked as community wiki unless he adds more body content. If the user decides to post the answer anyway, the answer is marked community wiki and no reputation is gained.

  • Deny: Outright deny posting the answer.

This should reduce the number of users posting small and cryptic answers linking to an other site.

I think a change is required as this has become a community problem and this trend cannot be reversed on a case-by-case down-voting of those types of answers. New users have no idea that this is frowned upon which is why this problem needs to be solved systematically.

Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
Source Link

For a background of the problem, see this other question.


  

Feature Proposal

This feature proposal is reduce posting of "linking"linking hit-and-runs"runs" answers.

An answer is a "linking"linking hit-and-run"run" if links occupy >=>= 15% of the body and the character count if lower or equal to 200.

If an answer is qualified as a "linking"linking hit-and-run"run", one of the following actions could be implemented:

  • Warning Only: Warn the user that his answer is a "linking"linking hit-and-run"run" and considered bad etiquette on this website to post that kind of answer and that posting such answer might incur negative reputation for that very reason.

     
  • Warning and CW: Warn the user that his answer is a "linking"linking hit-and-run"run" and that it will be marked as community wiki unless he adds more body content. If the user decides to post the answer anyway, the answer is marked community wiki and no reputation is gained.

     
  • Deny: Outright deny posting the answer.

     

This should reduce the number of users posting small and cryptic answers linking to an other site.

I think a change is required as this has become a community problem and this trend cannot be reversed on a case-by-case down-voting of those types of answers. New users have no idea that this is frowned upon which is why this problem needs to be solved systematically.

For a background of the problem, see this other question.


 

Feature Proposal

This feature proposal is reduce posting of "linking hit-and-runs" answers.

An answer is a "linking hit-and-run" if links occupy >= 15% of the body and the character count if lower or equal to 200.

If an answer is qualified as a "linking hit-and-run", one of the following actions could be implemented:

  • Warning Only: Warn the user that his answer is a "linking hit-and-run" and considered bad etiquette on this website to post that kind of answer and that posting such answer might incur negative reputation for that very reason.

  • Warning and CW: Warn the user that his answer is a "linking hit-and-run" and that it will be marked as community wiki unless he adds more body content. If the user decides to post the answer anyway, the answer is marked community wiki and no reputation is gained.

  • Deny: Outright deny posting the answer.

This should reduce the number of users posting small and cryptic answers linking to an other site.

I think a change is required as this has become a community problem and this trend cannot be reversed on a case-by-case down-voting of those types of answers. New users have no idea that this is frowned upon which is why this problem needs to be solved systematically.

For a background of the problem, see this other question.

 

Feature Proposal

This feature proposal is reduce posting of "linking hit-and-runs" answers.

An answer is a "linking hit-and-run" if links occupy >= 15% of the body and the character count if lower or equal to 200.

If an answer is qualified as a "linking hit-and-run", one of the following actions could be implemented:

  • Warning Only: Warn the user that his answer is a "linking hit-and-run" and considered bad etiquette on this website to post that kind of answer and that posting such answer might incur negative reputation for that very reason.

     
  • Warning and CW: Warn the user that his answer is a "linking hit-and-run" and that it will be marked as community wiki unless he adds more body content. If the user decides to post the answer anyway, the answer is marked community wiki and no reputation is gained.

     
  • Deny: Outright deny posting the answer.

     

This should reduce the number of users posting small and cryptic answers linking to an other site.

I think a change is required as this has become a community problem and this trend cannot be reversed on a case-by-case down-voting of those types of answers. New users have no idea that this is frowned upon which is why this problem needs to be solved systematically.

Migration of MSO links to MSE links
Source Link
Loading
edited tags
Link
Andrew Moore
  • 3.2k
  • 2
  • 27
  • 29
Loading
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Lance Roberts
  • 83.6k
  • 20
  • 188
  • 317
Loading
added 117 characters in body
Source Link
Andrew Moore
  • 3.2k
  • 2
  • 27
  • 29
Loading
deleted 1596 characters in body
Source Link
Andrew Moore
  • 3.2k
  • 2
  • 27
  • 29
Loading
added 550 characters in body
Source Link
Andrew Moore
  • 3.2k
  • 2
  • 27
  • 29
Loading
added 486 characters in body
Source Link
Andrew Moore
  • 3.2k
  • 2
  • 27
  • 29
Loading
added 330 characters in body; added 6 characters in body
Source Link
Andrew Moore
  • 3.2k
  • 2
  • 27
  • 29
Loading
Post Made Community Wiki by Andrew Moore
Source Link
Andrew Moore
  • 3.2k
  • 2
  • 27
  • 29
Loading