Timeline for Should dissenting answers on new policy posts be deleted by staff?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2023 at 17:59 | comment | added | Andreas condemns Israel | So, the problem with making everything so scattered (so many questions the last few days), is that's it hard to feature them. Which one should be featured? Which one should not? We're failing at making the community visible in this. | |
| May 31, 2023 at 11:53 | comment | added | ꓢPArcheon | see my tangential post here. It should be made clear what is just an announcement and what is open to feedback | |
| May 31, 2023 at 1:11 | answer | added | Ryan M | timeline score: 29 | |
| May 31, 2023 at 0:33 | answer | added | Chris | timeline score: 19 | |
| May 31, 2023 at 0:00 | answer | added | SpevacusMod | timeline score: 20 | |
| May 30, 2023 at 23:54 | answer | added | Kevin B | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 30, 2023 at 23:41 | answer | added | Andreas condemns Israel | timeline score: 10 | |
| May 30, 2023 at 23:39 | comment | added | Kevin B | I'm most certainly not defending this policy, but i do find it quite silly to try to make an argument on a post that they're going to purposely bury rather than making a new one that gets to HMP and stays high scored. | |
| May 30, 2023 at 23:38 | comment | added | 0Valt | @KevinB note how nothing says they have to be deleted :) And also "generally". I am honestly surprised that you chose to defend the company actions on the technicality given all that's going on. | |
| May 30, 2023 at 23:38 | answer | added | terdon | timeline score: 7 | |
| May 30, 2023 at 23:37 | comment | added | Kevin B | @OlegValteriswithUkraine While also being tagged mod-agreement-policy which states "This tag indicates posts that are official Stack Exchange policy that moderators are expected to abide by. Answers to these posts are generally locked so only staff members can edit." I can quote tag descriptions too! | |
| May 30, 2023 at 23:36 | comment | added | 0Valt | @KevinB well... because it's neither faq nor announcement in the first place? It's explicitly tagged discussion, which states as follows: "This tag is used for questions that ask users to discuss an idea, concept, or problem." | |
| May 30, 2023 at 23:34 | comment | added | Kevin B | I mean... that's precisely how we handle FAQ's on meta. Why should company policy statements be any different? They aren't there for discussion, they're there to present the policy. | |
| May 30, 2023 at 23:34 | answer | added | 0Valt | timeline score: 49 | |
| May 30, 2023 at 23:21 | answer | added | Anton Menshov | timeline score: 24 | |
| May 30, 2023 at 23:16 | comment | added | CDR | starball's answer here touches on the apparent contradiction. | |
| May 30, 2023 at 23:08 | history | asked | Undo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |