Return to Answer

I believe that heuristics that "should not be included as the foundation for taking action" should be revealed to the general public.

This will lower the number of flags that eventually will be declined as unfounded.

Additionally, this will allow those who are willing to flag such content to adjust their "identification techniques".

And at the same time, I don't believe that disclosure of such heuristics would benefit malicious actors in any way.

Edit: third block of heuristics for me sounds like heuristics that should never be used for identification of GPT answers, and will be automatically disregarded by moderator when looking at raised flags. Perhaps, clear example of such heuristic would be use of GPT detectors.

And I'm advocating only for disclosure of that "never-acceptable" heuristics list.

If third redacted block is in fact references something else, as Mithical points out, please consider clarifying that part of announcement.

I believe that heuristics that "should not be included as the foundation for taking action" should be revealed to the general public.

This will lower the number of flags that eventually will be declined as unfounded.

Additionally, this will allow those who are willing to flag such content to adjust their "identification techniques".

And at the same time, I don't believe that disclosure of such heuristics would benefit malicious actors in any way.

Edit: the third block of heuristics sounds to me like heuristics that should never be used for identification of GPT answers, and will be automatically disregarded by moderators when looking at raised flags. Perhaps a clear example of such a heuristic would be the use of GPT detectors.

And I'm advocating only for disclosure of that "never-acceptable" heuristics list.

If the third redacted block in fact references something else, as Mithical points out, please consider clarifying that part of the announcement.

I believe that heuristics that "should not be included as the foundation for taking action" should be revealed to the general public.

This will lower the number of flags that eventually will be declined as unfounded.

Additionally, this will allow those who are willing to flag such content to adjust their "identification techniques".

And at the same time, I don't believe that disclosure of such heuristics would benefit malicious actors in any way.

I believe that heuristics that "should not be included as the foundation for taking action" should be revealed to the general public.

This will lower the number of flags that eventually will be declined as unfounded.

Additionally, this will allow those who are willing to flag such content to adjust their "identification techniques".

And at the same time, I don't believe that disclosure of such heuristics would benefit malicious actors in any way.

Edit: third block of heuristics for me sounds like heuristics that should never be used for identification of GPT answers, and will be automatically disregarded by moderator when looking at raised flags. Perhaps, clear example of such heuristic would be use of GPT detectors.

And I'm advocating only for disclosure of that "never-acceptable" heuristics list.

If third redacted block is in fact references something else, as Mithical points out, please consider clarifying that part of announcement.

I believe that heuristics that "should not be included as the foundation for taking action" should be revealed to the general public.

This will lower the number of flags that eventually will be declined as unfounded.

Additionally, this will allow those who are willing to flag such content to adjust their "identification techniques".

And at the same time, I don't believe that disclosure of such heuristics wouldn't benefit malicious actors in any way.

I believe that heuristics that "should not be included as the foundation for taking action" should be revealed to the general public.

This will lower the number of flags that eventually will be declined as unfounded.

Additionally, this will allow those who are willing to flag such content to adjust their "identification techniques".

And at the same time, I don't believe that disclosure of such heuristics would benefit malicious actors in any way.