Return to Answer

It looks like we might be in for another drive-by-shootingspate of design changes...

Since there are already a lot of answers and quite a lot of text, let me stick to some key messages and principles.

1. Be more humble: Your design should be a public service, not a visionary experiment.

2. Start by reverting/fixing onerous and injurious previous design element changes

   Some examples:

   • Question list page lost its columns making it harder to read through
   • The increase of line spacing to 1.5x justified by a false claim of a usability requirement.
   • The introduction of an unnecessary left sidebar - it can be removed, but the default should change.

   All of these were rejected by the users - some staunchly rejected - and still they persist.

3. Don't redesign without mass public demand. Just say no to that nasty urge.

4. In (website) design, Newer != Better and also Fashionable != Better.

Finally, remember the first ethical rule for doctors: Primum non nocere.

It looks like we might be in for another extremely disappointing spate of design changes...

Since there are already a lot of answers and quite a lot of text, let me stick to some key messages and principles.

1. Be more humble: Your design should be a public service, not a visionary experiment.

2. Start by reverting/fixing onerous and injurious previous design element changes

   Some examples:

   • Question list page lost its columns making it harder to read through
   • The increase of line spacing to 1.5x justified by a false claim of a usability requirement.
   • The introduction of an unnecessary left sidebar - it can be removed, but the default should change.

   All of these were rejected by the users - some staunchly rejected - and still they persist.

3. Don't redesign without mass public demand. Just say no to that nasty urge.

4. In (website) design, Newer != Better and also Fashionable != Better.

Finally, remember the first ethical rule for doctors: Primum non nocere.

It looks like we might be in for another extremely disappointing spate of design changes...

Since there are already a lot of answers and quite a lot of text, let me stick to some key messages and principles.

1. Be more humble: Your design should be a public service, not a visionary experiment.

2. Start by reverting/fixing onerous and injurious previous design element changes

   Some examples:

   • Question list page lost its columns making it harder to read through
   • The increase of line spacing to 1.5x justified by a false claim of a usability requirement.
   • The introduction of an unnecessary left sidebar - it can be removed, but the default should change.

   All of these were rejected by the users - some staunchly rejected - and still they persist.

3. Don't redesign without mass public demand. Just say no to that nasty urge.

4. In (website) design, Newer != Better and also Fashionable != Better.

Finally, remember the first ethical rule for doctors: Primum non nocere.

It looks like we might be in for another drive-by-shootingspate of design changes...

Since there are already a lot of answers and quite a lot of text, let me stick to some key messages and principles.

1. Be more humble: Your design should be a public service, not a visionary experiment.

2. Start by reverting/fixing onerous and injurious previous design element changes

   Some examples:

   • Question list page lost its columns making it harder to read through
   • The increase of line spacing to 1.5x justified by a false claim of a usability requirement.
   • The introduction of an unnecessary left sidebar - it can be removed, but the default should change.

   All of these were rejected by the users - some staunchly rejected - and still they persist.

3. Don't redesign without mass public demand. Just say no to that nasty urge.

4. In (website) design, Newer != Better and also Fashionable != Better.

Finally, remember the first ethical rule for doctors: Primum non nocere.

It looks like we might be in for another extremely disappointing spate of drive-by-shooting^H^H^H^H^H^ design changes...

Since there are already a lot of answers and quite a lot of text, let me stick to some key messages and principles.

1. Be more humble: Your design should be a public service, not a visionary experiment.

2. Start by reverting/fixing onerous and injurious previous design element changes

   Some examples:

   • Question list page lost its columns making it harder to read through
   • The increase of line spacing to 1.5x justified by a false claim of a usability requirement.
   • The introduction of an unnecessary left sidebar - it can be removed, but the default should change.

   All of these were rejected by the users - some staunchly rejected - and still they persist.

3. Don't redesign without mass public demand. Just say no to that nasty urge.

4. In (website) design, Newer != Better and also Fashionable != Better.

Finally, remember the first ethical rule for doctors: Primum non nocere.

It looks like we might be in for another extremely disappointing spate of design changes...

Since there are already a lot of answers and quite a lot of text, let me stick to some key messages and principles.

1. Be more humble: Your design should be a public service, not a visionary experiment.

2. Start by reverting/fixing onerous and injurious previous design element changes

   Some examples:

   • Question list page lost its columns making it harder to read through
   • The increase of line spacing to 1.5x justified by a false claim of a usability requirement.
   • The introduction of an unnecessary left sidebar - it can be removed, but the default should change.

   All of these were rejected by the users - some staunchly rejected - and still they persist.

3. Don't redesign without mass public demand. Just say no to that nasty urge.

4. In (website) design, Newer != Better and also Fashionable != Better.

Finally, remember the first ethical rule for doctors: Primum non nocere.