Timeline for Should migrations continue to be allowed if the author is question-banned but their 6-month rate has opened up, or should they be blocked?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23 at 9:40 | answer | added | reneMod | timeline score: 13 | |
| Jan 23 at 7:30 | comment | added | Robert Longson | @TheMaster Prevalence helps us determine what, if any, priority to assign to this, keeping in mind the opportunity cost of not being able to spend that time doing something of more universal use. | |
| Jan 23 at 6:59 | comment | added | TheMaster | @RobertLongson Prevalence is a important statistic. But that's not the only thing that is of value. Post ban itself is rare. But, from a post-banned user pov, that one question in 6 months is of high value to that user, who wants to contribute and improve. We shouldn't reduce the value of such contributions due to technicality and put unnecessary hurdles. | |
| Jan 23 at 6:56 | comment | added | TheMaster | Related: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/396260/… | |
| Jan 23 at 6:56 | comment | added | Robert Longson | How often does this happen in practice? You've found a swallow so far and not a summer. I.e. is it worth worrying about at all? | |
| Jan 23 at 6:50 | history | asked | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | CC BY-SA 4.0 |