Skip to main content
added 599 characters in body
Source Link

The people who run Stack Exchange have finally admitconceded that comments have their use beyond. Beyond requests of clarification, detail, evidence of research, and informing authorsusers their questions are either off-topic or a duplicate. Moreover, theduplicate; comments–I presume–will not to be locked, transferred to chat, edited or deleted by moderators or staff members. There's also a good chance that the number of flags, especially on Stack Overflow, will drop significantly as users who insist SO and other Stack Exchange sites are not forums will refrain from raising flags every time they encounter a meaningful banter between two or more users in their field of expertise.

How does this groundbreaking experiment work? In a video entitled Community Discussions, the narratorfemalr voice-over, which I swear is a femalegenerated by an AI voice-over, describes the simple process:

P.S. HowBy the way, how is “community discussions” significantly different from a foruman online forum or message board? How will SE differentiate from Reddit?

Comments areWe were told years ago that comments were worthless, they addadded only noise. Stack Exchange iswas different, we focusit focused on answers not on chit-chat. We've all heard (and mostly accepted) this argument, haven't we? Examples:

Instead, six years later, comments will occupy a higher role: productive they will be productive, meaningful, an immediate way to share opinions and experiences in any of the ramifications a single post might generate.

Returning to the announced initiatives and the related BlogStack Overflow article, I read the following [emphasis in bold mine]

Am I seeing irony where none exists?

Only now does the company fully appreciate its legacy and success lies with the user base, complete with their human interactions and their behavioural flaws. It has also paid tribute to the incredible generosity of its communities on numerous occasions. Yet, at the same time SE seeks to promote AI generated content, as if it were the deus ex machina, in the present crises. Madness.

The people who run Stack Exchange finally admit comments have their use beyond requests of clarification, detail, evidence of research, and informing authors their questions are either off-topic or a duplicate. Moreover, the comments–I presume–will not to be locked, transferred to chat, edited or deleted by moderators or staff members. There's also a good chance that the number of flags, especially on Stack Overflow, will drop significantly as users who insist SO and other Stack Exchange sites are not forums will refrain from raising flags every time they encounter a meaningful banter between two or more users in their field of expertise.

How does this groundbreaking experiment work? In a video entitled Community Discussions, the narrator, which I swear is a female AI voice-over, describes the simple process:

P.S. How is “community discussions” significantly different from a forum?

Comments are worthless, they add only noise. Stack Exchange is different, we focus on answers not on chit-chat. We've all heard (and mostly accepted) this argument, haven't we?

Instead, six years later, comments will occupy a higher role: productive, meaningful, an immediate way to share opinions and experiences in any of the ramifications a single post might generate.

Returning to the announced initiatives and the related Blog article I read the following [emphasis in bold mine]

Am I seeing irony where none exists?

The people who run Stack Exchange have finally conceded that comments have their use. Beyond requests of clarification, detail, evidence of research, and informing users their questions are either off-topic or a duplicate; comments–I presume–will not to be locked, transferred to chat, edited or deleted by moderators or staff members. There's also a good chance that the number of flags, especially on Stack Overflow, will drop significantly as users who insist SO and other Stack Exchange sites are not forums will refrain from raising flags every time they encounter a meaningful banter between two or more users in their field of expertise.

How does this groundbreaking experiment work? In a video entitled Community Discussions, the femalr voice-over, which I swear is generated by an AI, describes the simple process:

By the way, how is “community discussions” significantly different from an online forum or message board? How will SE differentiate from Reddit?

We were told years ago that comments were worthless, they added only noise. Stack Exchange was different, it focused on answers not chit-chat. We've all heard (and mostly accepted) this argument, haven't we? Examples:

Instead, six years later, comments will occupy a higher role: they will be productive, meaningful, an immediate way to share opinions and experiences in any of the ramifications a single post might generate.

Returning to the announced initiatives and the related Stack Overflow article, I read the following [emphasis in bold mine]

Am I seeing irony where none exists?

Only now does the company fully appreciate its legacy and success lies with the user base, complete with their human interactions and their behavioural flaws. It has also paid tribute to the incredible generosity of its communities on numerous occasions. Yet, at the same time SE seeks to promote AI generated content, as if it were the deus ex machina, in the present crises. Madness.

formatting
Source Link

The combination of community-driven verification with AI generated excitement about improved trust and reliability of technical content; however, user trust in the accuracy and relevancy of content is paramount. Transparency is key. […]
AI-powered search features helped developers cut down on time in low-complexity situations, but sometimes ran into hallucinations when dealing with answers to more complex problems.
Source: Community Products: Reflections and looking ahead March 27, 2024

  • The combination of community-driven verification with AI generated excitement about improved trust and reliability of technical content; however, user trust in the accuracy and relevancy of content is paramount. Transparency is key.
  • AI-powered search features helped developers cut down on time in low-complexity situations, but sometimes ran into hallucinations when dealing with answers to more complex problems.
    Source: Community Products: Reflections and looking ahead March 27, 2024

The combination of community-driven verification with AI generated excitement about improved trust and reliability of technical content; however, user trust in the accuracy and relevancy of content is paramount. Transparency is key. […]
AI-powered search features helped developers cut down on time in low-complexity situations, but sometimes ran into hallucinations when dealing with answers to more complex problems.
Source: Community Products: Reflections and looking ahead March 27, 2024

  • The combination of community-driven verification with AI generated excitement about improved trust and reliability of technical content; however, user trust in the accuracy and relevancy of content is paramount. Transparency is key.
  • AI-powered search features helped developers cut down on time in low-complexity situations, but sometimes ran into hallucinations when dealing with answers to more complex problems.
    Source: Community Products: Reflections and looking ahead March 27, 2024

Try Discussions for all technical topics on Stack Overflow.

Share insights about all your favorite technologies.

  • Seek advice, expertise, and best practices from others.
  • Dive into meaningful conversations with others in the community.
  • Communicate your opinions about specific areas of practice.
  • Registered users can create new Discussions and reply to existing Discussions.
  • While voting is supported and post scores are tracked, there is no reputation impact to voting within Discussions.

The people who run Stack Exchange finally admit comments have their use beyond requests of clarification, detail, evidence of research, and informing authors their questions are either off-topic or a duplicate. Moreover, the comments–I presume–will not to be locked, transferred to chat, edited or deleted by moderators or staff members. There's also a good chance that the number of flags, especially on Stack Overflow, will drop significantly as users who insist SO and other Stack Exchange sites are not forums will refrain from raising flags every time they encounter a meaningful banter between two or more users in their field of expertise.

How does this groundbreaking experiment work? In a video entitled Community Discussions, the narrator, which I swear is a female AI voice-over, describes the simple process:

…you see a discussion where someone is asking for opinions or thoughts on which approach they should take. You click into the full discussion and read through the comments. Then you want to add in your perspective. You share your thoughts on what they can consider, thinking about how they can trade off between future proofing their approach and future expense associated with it. You post your input and are part of the discussion.

Will this experiment gradually be extended across the network?


P.S. How is “community discussions” significantly different from a forum?

Comments are worthless, they add only noise. Stack Exchange is different, we focus on answers not on chit-chat. We've all heard (and mostly accepted) this argument, haven't we?

I have been told time and again, as have others, that the Questions and to a far greater extent Answers are what matter in the long run; comments are ephemeral. Source: @KorvinStarmast

A former Community leader, much respected, posted in June 2018 the following reflections: [emphasis mine]

Try not to provide full answers in comments; if you end up working a problem out in comments, please move it to an answer. We know you're trying to help, but the system expects answers to questions. If we're reiterating that comments are ephemeral (and they are), we have to caution against leaving good information in them that needs to last, too

Instead, six years later, comments will occupy a higher role: productive, meaningful, an immediate way to share opinions and experiences in any of the ramifications a single post might generate.

Returning to the announced initiatives and the related Blog article I read the following [emphasis in bold mine]

As we consider integrating AI into our platform through partnerships and new features, we remain committed to preserving the essence of Stack Overflow: a space driven by human connection and genuine knowledge sharing.

and further along…

The combination of community-driven verification with AI generated excitement about improved trust and reliability of technical content; however, user trust in the accuracy and relevancy of content is paramount. Transparency is key. […]
AI-powered search features helped developers cut down on time in low-complexity situations, but sometimes ran into hallucinations when dealing with answers to more complex problems.
Source: Community Products: Reflections and looking ahead March 27, 2024

SE cannot pretend to value human-generated content when visitors and users alike will soon be provided with solutions generated by AI, which in turn will (miraculously) be curated by the human community. Why would developers, programmers and engineers sacrifice their precious time and years of experience on checking the validity of AI codes? It's plainly absurd.

Am I seeing irony where none exists?