Timeline for In today's era where artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly ubiquitous, what significance does a Q&A website still hold？ [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16 at 18:45 | comment | added | PM 2Ring | Consider: if ChatGPT can answer all your work-related questions, it can (probably) do your job... | |
| Jul 16 at 14:15 | history | edited | Starship | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fix
|
| Jul 15 at 15:21 | comment | added | user1502910 | Sure, feel free to use it, for yourself, in an isolated fashion, as many will do. Some will learn the hard way, on their own. Nobody here is saying anyone should refuse to use AI. We just don't want to contribute to that by having AI answers muddying the waters on Stack Overflow, for example, where answers are expected to be authoritative, and - unlike you asking some chatbot a question in isolation - the answers can be subject to scrutiny by humans, and corrected/improved when appropriate. | |
| Jul 15 at 14:07 | comment | added | Rrravi | @F1Krazy，Thank you.I am not making excuses for AI's mistakes，I just want to say making mistakes is not a logical reason to refuse to use it. Even if we choose humans, the same difficulty would arise. | |
| Jul 15 at 12:24 | comment | added | F1Krazy | "I knew well that AI made some mistakes ,but humans did it too(even worse )." - tu quoque fallacy. "with the development of AI we have enough reasons to believe that it will become increasingly accurate and effective." - you're not the first person to make this argument, but it's not a very good one IMO. AI will likely improve in the future, yes, but only means that the site might become obsolete in the future once that's actually happened, not that it is obsolete now. | |
| Jul 15 at 9:38 | history | edited | Rrravi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 330 characters in body
|
| Jul 15 at 9:03 | vote | accept | Rrravi | ||
| Jul 15 at 8:04 | history | closed |
JonathanZ PolyGeo Shadow Wizard discussion Users with the discussion badge or a synonym can single-handedly close discussion questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed. |
Duplicate of Could ChatGPT be a viable way to answer people's questions? | |
| Jul 15 at 6:18 | answer | added | Journeyman Geek | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 15 at 5:22 | answer | added | Augusto Vasques | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jul 15 at 4:58 | history | edited | bobble | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
normalized orthography
|
| Jul 15 at 4:52 | answer | added | Pimp Juice IT | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 15 at 4:45 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 15 at 8:05 | |||||
| Jul 15 at 4:00 | history | edited | Franck Dernoncourt |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 15 at 4:00 | answer | added | Franck Dernoncourt | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 15 at 3:55 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 15 at 4:20 | |||||
| Jul 15 at 3:42 | answer | added | Starship | timeline score: -3 | |
| Jul 15 at 3:29 | comment | added | user1502910 | If you think it is always accurate, I have to wonder how many problems you’ve solved using ChatGPT exclusively. There are reasons it’s banned on most sites, and there have been many conversations about it here. AI is great for solving some problems but it’s just not aligned with the type of answers users have come to expect here - they want advice based on knowledge and experience, not regurgitated summaries of questionable authority. | |
| Jul 15 at 3:16 | history | asked | Rrravi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |