Timeline for Why are there so many feature-request with no official response? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 20, 2017 at 9:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
|
|
Oct 10, 2013 at 16:04 | history | edited | ChrisFMod |
edited tags
|
|
Jul 26, 2013 at 14:15 | history | closed |
gnat yoozer8 Bart Tobias Kienzler Hugo Dozois |
Duplicate of Why don't all bugs and feature-requests have moderator status tags? | |
Jul 26, 2013 at 12:45 | review | Close votes | |||
Jul 26, 2013 at 14:15 | |||||
Jul 26, 2013 at 12:27 | comment | added | gnat | see also: Why don't we get responses from bug reports? | |
Jul 26, 2013 at 11:35 | history | edited | Himanshu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 55 characters in body
|
Mar 2, 2010 at 16:57 | comment | added | rlb.usa | Woah, wait a minute - I realize that SO and all of it's components are Jeff's baby - but the responsibility to answer/look at all of them by himself is overwhelming! This does not seem like a good business practice at all - I thought he had a team to help him with this. If he doesn't he should. | |
Mar 2, 2010 at 2:58 | history | edited | perbert | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
my idea was to add a single search that would do a "feature-request ^status-*" search, but SO search doesn't support the not operator apparently
|
Mar 2, 2010 at 1:29 | answer | added | Jeff Atwood | timeline score: 8 | |
Feb 25, 2010 at 2:33 | comment | added | quack quixote | @urdnot: i think that covers all the possibilities right there. especially the descent into inanity and incomprehensibility there at the end. | |
Feb 24, 2010 at 17:29 | comment | added | Rich Seller | @Downvoter, I'm aware of that, but many of the same principles apply. Apparently including not responding to all the feature requests that quickly | |
Feb 24, 2010 at 15:50 | vote | accept | juan | ||
Feb 24, 2010 at 15:47 | answer | added | Jeremy Smyth | timeline score: 20 | |
Feb 24, 2010 at 15:32 | comment | added | juan | @rich, be advised, SO is not SE (including the development team and general practices) | |
Feb 24, 2010 at 15:28 | comment | added | Rich Seller | I've asked the same question on meta.se (meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3193/…), I guess it is partly down to the sheer weight of numbers | |
Feb 24, 2010 at 15:12 | comment | added | juan | @urd, I'm not just talking about mine, but your point is taken | |
Feb 24, 2010 at 15:09 | comment | added | Welbog | Take your pick: Because Jeff is too lazy to respond. Because Jeff is too busy to respond. Because Jeff thinks your requests are stupid. Because Jeff is too busy thinking other requests are stupid to look at yours. Because Jeff is too lazy because he's spent too much time busily looking at stupid requests like yours. Because Jeff is too busily stupid your lazy spent much requests looking too thinking other yours respond because Jeff. | |
Feb 24, 2010 at 14:54 | comment | added | juan |
The feature-requests tag in this question is intended
|
|
Feb 24, 2010 at 14:54 | history | asked | juan | CC BY-SA 2.5 |