Timeline for Why was this answer with 281 Upvotes deleted by a Moderator? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2020 at 0:35 | history | closed |
Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog Robert Longson Anton Menshov SpevacusMod PolyGeo |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Apr 28, 2020 at 21:51 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 29, 2020 at 0:35 | |||||
| May 23, 2017 at 12:36 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Dec 30, 2012 at 7:01 | comment | added | Masked Man | @JeffAtwood I was not aware of the you don't work here anymore part. Regardless, my comment applies to whoever works here. "We don’t run Stack Overflow. The community does." Yes I know, you didn't say that, but you get my point. | |
| Dec 29, 2012 at 18:45 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | @ap. Where did I say "I run the site?" I don't even work at Stack Exchange any more. | |
| Dec 29, 2012 at 18:42 | comment | added | Masked Man | @JeffAtwood There is, and it is quite simple. Since you say that "you run the site" and all that, let some of the top users and moderators get a share of the site's revenue. I hope I do not need to explain how that would bring in more accountability. Are you willing to give it a try? :) | |
| Apr 14, 2010 at 16:51 | vote | accept | George Stocker | ||
| Apr 14, 2010 at 13:24 | comment | added | George Stocker | @raven LOL, that's funny. | |
| Apr 14, 2010 at 12:56 | comment | added | raven | I nominate George as Jonathan's "accountabilibuddy" southparkstudios.com/clips/155511 | |
| Apr 14, 2010 at 3:29 | comment | added | Andrew Grimm | @George: Strange. I thought I got a "page not found" error. Oh well. | |
| Apr 14, 2010 at 3:16 | comment | added | Sampson Mod | +1 Accountability FTW :) | |
| Apr 14, 2010 at 2:54 | answer | added | SampsonMod | timeline score: 12 | |
| Apr 14, 2010 at 2:07 | comment | added | juan | Suggestion for a meta-moderator figure in 3... 2... 1... | |
| Apr 14, 2010 at 2:07 | answer | added | Jeff Atwood | timeline score: 7 | |
| Apr 14, 2010 at 2:00 | answer | added | Tom RitterMod | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 14, 2010 at 1:57 | comment | added | George Stocker | I generally wouldn't bring this up; but this is a case where there seems to be no logical reason to remove the answer. It's valid, it's popular, and any of the comments could be deleted independently of the question. The only one I could think of would be if the original author wanted his answer deleted; but there's nothing with the answer that would require that, it could just be given over to the Community user. | |
| Apr 14, 2010 at 1:56 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | If only there was some way to moderate the moderators... | |
| Apr 14, 2010 at 1:54 | comment | added | random Mod | Oh good, it's another moderator this time. | |
| Apr 14, 2010 at 1:51 | comment | added | George Stocker | The question wasn't closed, but it was locked (no new answers can be added). The answer was deleted; independent of the question. | |
| Apr 14, 2010 at 1:48 | comment | added | Andrew Grimm | If you have access to the question, it might be helpful to list the reason it was closed. (It was closed, right?) | |
| Apr 14, 2010 at 1:44 | history | asked | George Stocker | CC BY-SA 2.5 |