Skip to main content
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Source Link

ThisThis question on SO (how to hash a password?) begs the question; How do I answer a question when doing so might facilitate a train wreck?

Eric Lippert's non-answer "Getting password security correct is about a heck of a lot more than getting SHA512 implemented correctly." is more pertinent to the original poster than the actual answer.

Should anyone answering the question have included additional caveats?

This question on SO (how to hash a password?) begs the question; How do I answer a question when doing so might facilitate a train wreck?

Eric Lippert's non-answer "Getting password security correct is about a heck of a lot more than getting SHA512 implemented correctly." is more pertinent to the original poster than the actual answer.

Should anyone answering the question have included additional caveats?

This question on SO (how to hash a password?) begs the question; How do I answer a question when doing so might facilitate a train wreck?

Eric Lippert's non-answer "Getting password security correct is about a heck of a lot more than getting SHA512 implemented correctly." is more pertinent to the original poster than the actual answer.

Should anyone answering the question have included additional caveats?

Source Link
user145242
user145242

How do I answer a question when doing so might facilitate a train wreck?

This question on SO (how to hash a password?) begs the question; How do I answer a question when doing so might facilitate a train wreck?

Eric Lippert's non-answer "Getting password security correct is about a heck of a lot more than getting SHA512 implemented correctly." is more pertinent to the original poster than the actual answer.

Should anyone answering the question have included additional caveats?