Skip to main content
Meta Stack Exchange

Return to Answer

Rollback to Revision 2
Source Link
devinb
devinb
  • 35.6k
  • 15
  • 72
  • 117

I think that because there is no "revision history" on "revision comments" then allowing mods to edit them is not a bad terriblegood idea.

However, allowing mods to delete the revision comments (the user generated part, not the "6 chars added" part) is something I would completely support.

I think that because there is no "revision history" on "revision comments" then allowing mods to edit them is a bad terrible idea.

However, allowing mods to delete the revision comments (the user generated part, not the "6 chars added" part) is something I would completely support.

I think that because there is no "revision history" on "revision comments" then allowing mods to edit them is not a good idea.

However, allowing mods to delete the revision comments (the user generated part, not the "6 chars added" part) is something I would completely support.

Rollback to Revision 1
Source Link
user1228
user1228

I think that because there is no "revision history" on "revision comments" then allowing mods to edit them is not a goodbad terrible idea.

However, allowing mods to delete the revision comments (the user generated part, not the "6 chars added" part) is something I would completely support.

I think that because there is no "revision history" on "revision comments" then allowing mods to edit them is not a good idea.

However, allowing mods to delete the revision comments (the user generated part, not the "6 chars added" part) is something I would completely support.

I think that because there is no "revision history" on "revision comments" then allowing mods to edit them is a bad terrible idea.

However, allowing mods to delete the revision comments (the user generated part, not the "6 chars added" part) is something I would completely support.

If I wasn't a mod, I'd berate his lineage, describe his bedroom habits and describe his offspring in none too flattering terms and there'd be nothing anybody could do about it. CURSE YOU, DIAMOND!
Source Link
user1228
user1228

I think that because there is no "revision history" on "revision comments" then allowing mods to edit them is not a bad terriblegood idea.

However, allowing mods to delete the revision comments (the user generated part, not the "6 chars added" part) is something I would completely support.

I think that because there is no "revision history" on "revision comments" then allowing mods to edit them is a bad terrible idea.

However, allowing mods to delete the revision comments (the user generated part, not the "6 chars added" part) is something I would completely support.

I think that because there is no "revision history" on "revision comments" then allowing mods to edit them is not a good idea.

However, allowing mods to delete the revision comments (the user generated part, not the "6 chars added" part) is something I would completely support.

Source Link
devinb
devinb
  • 35.6k
  • 15
  • 72
  • 117