Timeline for Questions with once good answers that are now out of date and need updates
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Sep 14, 2013 at 18:33 | history | suggested | David Thomas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor spelling corrections.
|
| Sep 14, 2013 at 18:22 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 14, 2013 at 18:33 | |||||
| Jan 6, 2011 at 13:51 | comment | added | jcolebrand | grrrr my brain doesn't read so well at night for some reason ... but what do you think about just having a new question? | |
| Jan 6, 2011 at 9:17 | comment | added | Ian Ringrose | @drachenstern, I think the answer should be edited, but just adding a single line warning a reader it is out of date and pointing to the new question. | |
| Jan 5, 2011 at 15:56 | comment | added | jcolebrand | -1 disagree: If we're talking about questions that have already been marked answered and they are sufficiently old for the target audience, then I say don't change the answer or the question. But if those two criteria aren't met, then sure, update one or the other or both. | |
| Jan 5, 2011 at 11:54 | comment | added | Ian Ringrose | @Marcog, the outdated quesions will still be useful to lots of people, not everyone is allowed to use new systems due to polices at work. | |
| Jan 5, 2011 at 11:30 | comment | added | tshepang | You might wanna add a note that not everyone can edit an answer. | |
| Jan 5, 2011 at 10:32 | comment | added | moinudin | What is the policy on the outdated question? Should it be closed? | |
| Jan 5, 2011 at 9:35 | history | answered | Ian Ringrose | CC BY-SA 2.5 |