Timeline for Close Votes expire too soon for low-traffic tags
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:36 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 21, 2016 at 11:35 | comment | added | kriss | Another problem is that reopening always happen on a closed question and by the rule above it means it has more than 100 views. The limits should definitely be different for reopening. | |
| Jun 21, 2016 at 11:25 | comment | added | kriss | Why number of views by people without close vote should matter at all ? Also reopening of closed questions (typically false duplicates) looks way harder than closing. The why is because if a question was initially closed as a false duplicate, it means that it at least lloks superficailly similar to another one, henceforth reopening would mean more thorough - time consuming - reviews, not the typical one minute review and close. Henceforth reopening votes should last longer than close votes. | |
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:45 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:28 | history | edited | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
| Jan 3, 2013 at 18:47 | comment | added | Maarten Bodewes | This is only a partial solution for uncommon tags. First of all, uncommon tags have less persons that have access to moderator tools, so 5 votes are really required. Second, there are far fewer people that look at the questions, let alone cast close votes. This means that we now have a huge backlog of questions waiting to be closed, and questions that really need to be closed are not actually closed. And they need to be closed, just saying that there are less people interested in the question so it does not need to be closed is a terrible, horrible argument. PS did vote UP. | |
| Jul 6, 2011 at 11:34 | comment | added | Awesome Poodles | @Ian Ringrose: Thanks, I swear I searched for similar questions before posting. I would have linked to yours if I'd found it. | |
| Jul 6, 2011 at 11:22 | comment | added | Ian Ringrose | see also meta.stackexchange.com/questions/87979/… | |
| Jul 6, 2011 at 10:29 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | @brock the link waffles posted is a 10k privilege stackoverflow.com/privileges/moderator-tools | |
| Jul 6, 2011 at 10:24 | vote | accept | Awesome Poodles | ||
| Jul 6, 2011 at 8:25 | history | edited | Jeff Atwood |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 6, 2011 at 8:16 | answer | added | Jeff Atwood | timeline score: 55 | |
| Jul 6, 2011 at 3:49 | answer | added | Thursagen | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jul 6, 2011 at 3:25 | comment | added | random Mod | It's a page that shows all pending close votes, recently closed and recently re-opened. | |
| Jul 6, 2011 at 3:00 | comment | added | Awesome Poodles | @waffles: I (¿and probably all non-mod users?) cannot see that link. Perhaps a description and/or screenshot for us plebes? | |
| Jul 6, 2011 at 2:51 | comment | added | waffles | kind of strange that we allow a 7 and 30 day time range here: stackoverflow.com/tools?tab=close&daterange=last30days | |
| Jul 6, 2011 at 2:40 | history | asked | Awesome Poodles | CC BY-SA 3.0 |