Possible Duplicate:
Distinguish votes to close by reason
It has been requested several times to list all reasons along with the user names who voted to close the question for those reasons, for example here: Distinguish close votes by reason (and in other posts linked in that question and comments).
The current state in not satisfying because the statement in the text box in a closed question is simply wrong, like here: https://stackoverflow.com/q/8301054/270591 I voted to close the question as a duplicate and not as not a real question. The message says I voted to close as not a real question which is not true.
I would also like one of the solutions mentioned in the other question above but if that doesn't get enough acceptance here are alternative proposals:
Change the message from closed as not a real question by... to closed as not a real question by the majority of... or similar.
Don't mention the users at all who voted to close for other reasons than the majority or say: closed as not a real question by Jim, Hannah, Bob and two other users. (The "two other users" refer to "closed", not to "as not a real question".)
Change the message to: closed as not a real question by Jim, Hannah, Bob. Jane and Bill voted to close for other reasons.
Change the message to: closed as not a real question and for more reasons by Jim, Hannah, Bob, Jane, Bill ...
The arguments I saw mainly in the other posts against listing all reasons and users in detail said that such a change would invite discussion and arguing about closing the question. I'd say it doesn't. If a question gets closed for two different reasons it is twice as bad as a question which gets closed for only one reason. It basically means that the question has been closed because it is duplicate and not a real question (and not or). (Sidenote: The duplicate in the link above got downvotes to -4 while the original (which hasn't been closed as not a real question) has +5 upvotes, but that's another subject.) So, there is even less to discuss about the fact that the question has been closed.