5

Possible Duplicate:
When the OP votes to close their own question as “belongs on …”, immediately migrate the question

Sometimes, I realize that a question I've asked on one site may be more suitable for another (for example, writers instead of english). If I vote to close my own question as off-topic (and specify the more appropriate site), I still have to wait for 4 other votes (or moderator action).

If I vote on my own question, wouldn't it be useful for the closing and transfer to become effective immediately?

Improve this question
1
  • I think I've seen this somewhere before...
    – tvanfosson
    Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 19:38

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
3

Sounds like a reasonable idea. Though I would limit it to a minimum rep and possibly only allow one migration of the question by the OP (to avoid them ping-ponging it all over the place).

In the meantime, you can flag your question for moderator attention and ask for the transfer to happen. This is better than waiting, as if any 2 closers do not select to migrate, the question will not get migrated.

Improve this answer
3

Doesn't sound unreasonable to me. Just a couple "devil's advocate" notes:

  1. You can already delete and repost, if you've not gotten any answers.
  2. It's possible that people who would use this might not be the best persons to decide where it should go, so the community vote might still be desireable.
  3. You wouldn't want people to use this as a way to ask questions on a site they've been banned on. (from Troyen in the comments, below)
Improve this answer
13
  • 2
    #1 kind of makes #2 pointless -- there's no reason to block migrations on the theory that "they might pick the wrong site" if they can just go manually post on that site anyway
    – Michael Mrozek
    Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 18:15
  • 1
    Possibly the ability to migrate should be dependant on a minimum rep on both sites?
    – shanethehat
    Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 18:15
  • 1
    You'd also want to make sure the question asker isn't banned on the site they choose to migrate to. (I don't know if this is checked when the community votes to migrate.)
    – Troyen
    Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 18:17
  • @Michael They can only do that if there are no answers. I don't violently disgaree otherwise.
    – Andrew Barber
    Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 18:17
  • @AndrewBarber Well, then they can skip the "delete" step and go straight to "repost". And they do, all the time
    – Michael Mrozek
    Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 18:18
  • @Troyen Excellent point. I've added it.
    – Andrew Barber
    Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 18:19
  • @Michael By that logic, why have Migrate at all?
    – Andrew Barber
    Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 18:20
  • 1
    @AndrewBarber I think you're misunderstanding; migrating is great, because it keeps all the history the post has built up. My question is, why restrict migrating at all? If the user can already do it the wrong way (manually reposting), why not let them do it the right way (migrating)? Obviously don't let them migrate if they're question-banned on the other site or something, but they shouldn't need some arbitrary rep amount on the target site or to get other users to vote as well or anything -- they don't need that stuff to just ask on the other site, so they shouldn't need it to migrate
    – Michael Mrozek
    Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 18:23
  • @Troyen It is, the question closes as off-topic instead
    – Michael Mrozek
    Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 18:24
  • @Michael If they do it the wrong way now, they'll continue to do it the wrong way then. But note I don't oppose this; I just think there are some things to keep in mind with it.
    – Andrew Barber
    Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 18:24
  • @AndrewBarber So the theory is "they'll probably do it the wrong way, so let's not even let them do it the right way"? I'm trying to head it off now because good ideas get shut down all the time for nonsense reasons
    – Michael Mrozek
    Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 18:26
  • @Michael Your comments seem to be assuming I'm opposed to this idea, which I am not.
    – Andrew Barber
    Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 18:27
  • @AndrewBarber No, they're assuming that someone will read this and think "he's got a point, we need to pile restrictions on this". Or worse, "clearly this is too dangerous to implement at all"
    – Michael Mrozek
    Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 18:28

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .