33

This question already has an answer here:

Here's an alternative proposal for the stackoverflow.com close queue. Two queues.

Queue #1 shows only questions that are no more than 24 hours old. The site would use this queue to get attention onto the most important area: the front page. Make it a way to gather community attention onto incoming crud.

Queue #2: older stuff. With an important twist: if you want to have humans slog through 80k of crap, try presenting it to them in batches that they can complete. This queue will never have more than 1000 things in it. The system will only dump the next 1000 things into it when we finish dealing with the previous 1000 things.

Net result: reviewers can visit queue #1 and have real impact on the state of the first page. They can visit queue #2, and have enough positive feedback in the form of progress to motivate them to come back.

marked as duplicate by animuson Nov 21 '13 at 16:39

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • ..or lower the votes required to close something. – Josh Crozier Sep 28 '13 at 19:16
  • 12
    Or increase limit on number of votes per day based on previous activities; just like flagging. – hjpotter92 Sep 28 '13 at 19:17
  • I think motivating people to visit (and return to) queue #2 will be hard/ nigh on impossible. – Matt Sep 28 '13 at 19:21
  • @Matt being able to see the number go down might help. – Cole Johnson Sep 28 '13 at 19:21
  • 1
    @Josh - I've been thinking that for some time. Motivated me to throw this over the fence – Adam Rackis Sep 28 '13 at 19:34
  • I like this idea, but with a badge for the user who completes each 1000th review (the "5th Caller" badge, or something) – Ben Collins Sep 29 '13 at 3:05
  • wonder how is this a duplicate? – gnat Dec 3 '13 at 16:33
3

+1 I like these suggestions, gamification ftw.

Keeping recent questions clean is a great start, and a great "objective". Gamification on the older questions would make it more fun for me to help get through the various "stages" of the old-close-votes-queue.

3

I think your idea is interesting (as do 22 others) and could be beneficial, but there is a potential trip hazard with it.
With a separation like this, a lot of people may just end up doing queue#1 more than queue#2, so while queue#1 is always clean and front page is too, the back log remains forever as is, or gets worse.

Also, the mentality on queue#2 is slightly off, as is your approach.
People can work better and especially slog on if they see progress being made - the pile of ironing going down, the paperwork slowly going from "in" tray to "done".

So with your idea, there always being 1,000 reviews to look at is not going to do this. Seeing the 80K go down will, however, make them feel something is being accomplished.

But +1 for your idea, as it does need a new idea to make it go down, as seemingly it's just not happening, or not quickly enough.

  • Meh. Forget the backlog. Clearing the front page is more of a priority than backlog. – Cole Johnson Sep 29 '13 at 2:57
  • Only marginally more important in the grand scheme of things. The longer the backlog is left, the less important the oldest reviews become. ie one from 4 months ago probs doesn't matter anymore, and so less point in doing them, however as they are still being worked through it becomes a potential waste of time. So it's all important.. but I agree front page has slightly higher priority. – James Sep 29 '13 at 3:05
  • 1
    If people are always clearing queue #1, then queue #2 won't be getting worse. – Josh Darnell Sep 29 '13 at 3:10
  • @jadarnel27: yes, of course. But the suggestion was queue#1 is last 24 hours. If X wasn't actioned within 24hrs then it's moved into queue#2 – James Sep 29 '13 at 3:15
  • @James but seeing how much less there would be compared to the current queue will help some people like me. I sometimes have to force myself to review the Close Vote queue because the number doesn't change when I do 40 reviews. I check back later and it goes up. That's discouraging. – Cole Johnson Oct 2 '13 at 16:35

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .