I wanted to update / improve my answers to the most viewed questions that I answered (cause I think that would make more sense than improving the most upvoted ones), however to my (slight) disappointment it appears as though combining is:answer
and views:N
results in just views:N
being acknowledged, and in only questions being displayed (i.e., it works the same as is:question views:N
).
If someone wants to try that (adjusting 5000
to show only a limited number of results if needed):
user:me is:answer views:5000
I mean, I understand that the number of views per answer is probably not even stored, so I completely get why views:N
would imply is:question
and trump is:answer
.
However I thought a semantic to is:answer
and views:N
could be implemented, such as:
Find answers to questions that have a number of views >= N
Honestly, I don't have a huge list of scenarios where this could be useful outside of what I'm trying to do, so I don't have a strong opinion on this, but I thought it was worth putting out for debate, maybe someone else will find better / more reasons why it would be useful (or why it would be detrimental, for reasons that I currently don't see).
score
andviews
would apply to both by reading the help page aloneanswers:5..10 is:answer
which returns a list of questions instead of nothing. So they are ignoringis:answer
there too.