Typo edits in the title: to approve, or not to approve?

Question

What's the recommended course of action for edits in the edit-queue that are basically corrections of typos in the question title (no other substantive change)?

e.g.:

• (1 character) https://stackoverflow.com/suggested-edits/67422
• (1 character) https://stackoverflow.com/suggested-edits/67423
• (1 character) https://stackoverflow.com/suggested-edits/67424
• (1 character) https://stackoverflow.com/suggested-edits/67425

Also, you'll notice these are all from the same user, who appears to be correcting misspellings of "database".

Answer 1

I just noticed these were title changes!

In titles, I think it is much more important to get key words correct -- so in the case of title edits, yes, these are OK and I would approve them.

If they were trivial body changes, I would be much less supportive of this, per https://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/04/in-defense-of-editing/

Answer 2

Reject or improve the suggested edit.

It's like putting on sunglasses on a face like a bucket. The rest of the body could do with some minor work and couldn't hurt fixing up the rest of it.

Yes, titles are the first thing you see. But when you're in there and the rest of the post is a mangled mess like running your fingers over the body of the Toxic Avenger, it's a bit of a bait and switch.

It's like something to do with margarine.