Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
This tag is for questions about suspected user spam, the spam flag, or combating spam as a community. For the network, spam is only advertisements or promotional content, not for other disruptive or unwanted messages.
-9
votes
A machine can flag spam automatically. Can it do better?
If it's:
99% spam, CharcoalAutoflag1 flags it.
99.5 CharcoalAutoflag2 also flags it
99.75 CharcoalAutoflag3 also flags it
99.95 CharcoalAutoflag4 also flags it
99.99 CharcoalAutoflag5 also flags … Having whichever account correlates to the highest level of certainty post a comment to the effect that "Charcoal's automated spam detection evaluates this post as 99.5% likely to be spam" or similar message …