Return to Question

Currently, according to Waffles, answers or questions that have been "reviewed" are suppressed if more than 2 people have reviewed them.

This is obviously a a Good Thing ^TM, however, it does mean that if two people review a question or answer and then flag it as spam or offensive then it disppears from the review queue.

This one is a good example. It's only just been closed after 2 hours; mainly, I believe, because it disappeared from the /review/first-answers and /review/late-answers tabs.

This semi-defeats the point of these flags, which is to allow the community at large to remove highly objectionable material without the need for moderator intervention, for instance if there's not one logged on at that time to review offensive flags.

My feature-request is that if a majority of people reviewing a question or answer have marked it as spam, or offensive, then that post should not be removed from the /review tab.

The reason for the majority is to stop abusive flagging and / or to ensure that it is actually offensive. As two people are required to review something if one of them flags a post as offensive it will remain in the review list. If a further person reviews the post and does not flag it the post will be removed. If they do then it will stay.

Currently, according to Waffles, answers or questions that have been "reviewed" are suppressed if more than 2 people have reviewed them.

This is obviously a a Good Thing ^TM, however, it does mean that if two people review a question or answer and then flag it as spam or offensive then it disppears from the review queue.

This one is a good example. It's only just been closed after 2 hours; mainly, I believe, because it disappeared from the /review/first-answers and /review/late-answers tabs.

This semi-defeats the point of these flags, which is to allow the community at large to remove highly objectionable material without the need for moderator intervention, for instance if there's not one logged on at that time to review offensive flags.

My feature-request is that if a majority of people reviewing a question or answer have marked it as spam, or offensive, then that post should not be removed from the /review tab.

The reason for the majority is to stop abusive flagging and / or to ensure that it is actually offensive. As two people are required to review something if one of them flags a post as offensive it will remain in the review list. If a further person reviews the post and does not flag it the post will be removed. If they do then it will stay.

Currently, according to Waffles, answers or questions that have been "reviewed" are suppressed if more than 2 people have reviewed them.

This is obviously a a Good Thing ^TM, however, it does mean that if two people review a question or answer and then flag it as spam or offensive then it disppears from the review queue.

This one is a good example. It's only just been closed after 2 hours; mainly, I believe, because it disappeared from the /review/first-answers and /review/late-answers tabs.

This semi-defeats the point of these flags, which is to allow the community at large to remove highly objectionable material without the need for moderator intervention, for instance if there's not one logged on at that time to review offensive flags.

My feature-request is that if a majority of people reviewing a question or answer have marked it as spam, or offensive, then that post should not be removed from the /review tab.

The reason for the majority is to stop abusive flagging and / or to ensure that it is actually offensive. As two people are required to review something if one of them flags a post as offensive it will remain in the review list. If a further person reviews the post and does not flag it the post will be removed. If they do then it will stay.

Currently, according to Waffles, answers or questions that have been "reviewed" are suppressed if more than 2 people have reviewed them.

This is obviously a a Good Thing ^TM, however, it does mean that if two people review a question or answer and then flag it as spam or offensive then it disppears from the review queue.

This one is a good example. It's only just been closed after 2 hours; mainly, I believe, because it disappeared from the /review/first-answers and /review/late-answers tabs.

This semi-defeats the point of these flags, which is to allow the community at large to remove highly objectionable material without the need for moderator intervention, for instance if there's not one logged on at that time to review offensive flags.

My feature-request is that if a majority of people reviewing a question or answer have marked it as spam, or offensive, then that post should not be removed from the /review tab.

The reason for the majority is to stop abusive flagging and / or to ensure that it is actually offensive. As two people are required to review something if one of them flags a post as offensive it will remain in the review list. If a further person reviews the post and does not flag it the post will be removed. If they do then it will stay.

Currently, according to Waffles, answers or questions that have been "reviewed" are suppressed if more than 2 people have reviewed them.

This is obviously a a Good Thing ^TM, however, it does mean that if two people review a question or answer and then flag it as spam or offensive then it disppears from the review queue.

This one is a good example. It's only just been closed after 2 hours; mainly, I believe, because it disappeared from the /review/first-answers and /review/late-answers tabs.

This semi-defeats the point of these flags, which is to allow the community at large to remove highly objectionable material without the need for moderator intervention, for instance if there's not one logged on at that time to review offensive flags.

My feature-request is that if a majority of people reviewing a question or answer have marked it as spam, or offensive, then that post should not be removed from the /review tab.

The reason for the majority is to stop abusive flagging and / or to ensure that it is actually offensive. As two people are required to review something if one of them flags a post as offensive it will remain in the review list. If a further person reviews the post and does not flag it the post will be removed. If they do then it will stay.

Currently, according to Waffles, answers or questions that have been "reviewed" are suppressed if more than 2 people have reviewed them.

This is obviously a a Good Thing ^TM, however, it does mean that if two people review a question or answer and then flag it as spam or offensive then it disppears from the review queue.

This one is a good example. It's only just been closed after 2 hours; mainly, I believe, because it disappeared from the /review/first-answers and /review/late-answers tabs.

This semi-defeats the point of these flags, which is to allow the community at large to remove highly objectionable material without the need for moderator intervention, for instance if there's not one logged on at that time to review offensive flags.

My feature-request is that if a majority of people reviewing a question or answer have marked it as spam, or offensive, then that post should not be removed from the /review tab.

The reason for the majority is to stop abusive flagging and / or to ensure that it is actually offensive. As two people are required to review something if one of them flags a post as offensive it will remain in the review list. If a further person reviews the post and does not flag it the post will be removed. If they do then it will stay.