Skip to main content
Second iteration.
Source Link

Due to changes in technologies, many answers were outdated. However, these answers were very good for the past, and they might also be useful for the same cases, but not for most. An example is a depreciated MySQL extension that was replaced with MySQLi, and the older PHP date time function whose use should be replaced by the newer (PHP date time class).

I am putting myself in a scenario: I do all my best to answer a question, my answer will be accepted and upvoted, but after one year, someone might write a comment and say:

This is a bad answer, outdated.

This is ethically right, notifying about an outdated answer is not a bad thing, but I am sure we can do this in another way, that does not destruct the person, considering that the answer was good in the past. My aim in this discussion is: What is the best etiquette for doing that? Is there any systematic procedure to be taken for improving the quality of answers?

Another issue here is someone that is searching for an answer, in. In case that we post an updated answer to the question, it might not get any upvotes, and then, the user will probably chose the one with a high number of upvotes (considering that it's peer reviewed).

Due to changes in technologies, many answers were outdated. However, these answers were very good for the past, and they might also be useful for the same cases, but not for most. An example is a depreciated MySQL extension that was replaced with MySQLi, and the older PHP date time function whose use should be replaced by the newer (PHP date time class).

I am putting myself in a scenario: I do all my best to answer a question, my answer will be accepted and upvoted, but after one year, someone might write a comment and say:

This is a bad answer, outdated.

This is ethically right, notifying about an outdated answer is not a bad thing, but I am sure we can do this in another way, that does not destruct the person, considering that the answer was good in the past. My aim in this discussion is: What is the best etiquette for doing that? Is there any systematic procedure to be taken for improving the quality of answers?

Another issue here is someone that searching for an answer, in case that we post an updated answer to the question, it might not get any upvotes, then, the user probably chose the one with a high number of upvotes (considering that it's peer reviewed).

Due to changes in technologies, many answers were outdated. However, these answers were very good for the past, and they might also be useful for the same cases, but not for most. An example is a depreciated MySQL extension that was replaced with MySQLi, and the older PHP date time function whose use should be replaced by the newer (PHP date time class).

I am putting myself in a scenario: I do all my best to answer a question, my answer will be accepted and upvoted, but after one year, someone might write a comment and say:

This is a bad answer, outdated.

This is ethically right, notifying about an outdated answer is not a bad thing, but I am sure we can do this in another way, that does not destruct the person, considering that the answer was good in the past. My aim in this discussion is: What is the best etiquette for doing that? Is there any systematic procedure to be taken for improving the quality of answers?

Another issue here is someone that is searching for an answer. In case that we post an updated answer to the question, it might not get any upvotes, and then the user will probably chose the one with a high number of upvotes (considering that it's peer reviewed).

Copy edited (but more work is needed, e.g. near "might also be useful for the same cases" and "that does not destruct the person"). (its = possessive, it's = "it is" or "it has". See for example <http://www.wikihow.com/Use-Its-and-It's>.)
Source Link

What is the best practice 'etiquette' to tell an answer is outdated and should be updated?

AccordingDue to changes in technologies, many answers were outdated, however. However, these answers were very good for thathe past, and they might be also be useful for the same cases, but not for most, an. An example is a depreciated mysqlMySQL extension that was replaced with mysqliMySQLi, and the older PHP date time function thatwhose use should be replaced by the newer (PHP date time class) should be used.

I am putting myself in a scenario: I do all my best to answer a question, my answer will be accepted and upvoted, but after one year, some onesomeone might write a comment and say:

This is a bad answer, outdated.

This is ethically right, notifying about an outdated answer is not a bad-thing thing, but I am sure we can do this byin another way, of which that does not destruct the person. Considering, considering that the answer werewas good forin the past. My aim in this discussion is to know: whatWhat is the best etiquette for doing that? Is there any systematic procedure to be taken for improving the quality of answers?

Another issue here is someone that searching for an answer, in case that we post an updated answer to the question, it might not get any upvoteupvotes, then, the user probably chose the one with a high upvotenumber of upvotes (considering that itsit's peer reviewed).

What is the best practice 'etiquette' to tell an answer is outdated and should be updated

According to changes in technologies, many answers were outdated, however, these answers were very good for tha past, they might be also useful for same cases, but not for most, an example is depreciated mysql extension that replaced with mysqli, and older PHP date time function that newer (PHP date time class) should be used.

I am putting myself in a scenario: I do all my best to answer a question, my answer will be accepted and upvoted, but after one year, some one might write a comment and say:

This is bad answer, outdated

This is ethically right, notifying about outdated answer is not a bad-thing, but I am sure we can do this by another way, of which that not destruct the person. Considering that the answer were good for past. My aim in this discussion is to know what is the best etiquette for doing that? Is there any systematic procedure to taken for improving quality of answers?

Another issue here is someone that searching for an answer, in case that we post updated answer to the question, it might not get any upvote, then, user probably chose the one with high upvote (considering that its peer reviewed).

What is the best practice 'etiquette' to tell an answer is outdated and should be updated?

Due to changes in technologies, many answers were outdated. However, these answers were very good for the past, and they might also be useful for the same cases, but not for most. An example is a depreciated MySQL extension that was replaced with MySQLi, and the older PHP date time function whose use should be replaced by the newer (PHP date time class).

I am putting myself in a scenario: I do all my best to answer a question, my answer will be accepted and upvoted, but after one year, someone might write a comment and say:

This is a bad answer, outdated.

This is ethically right, notifying about an outdated answer is not a bad thing, but I am sure we can do this in another way, that does not destruct the person, considering that the answer was good in the past. My aim in this discussion is: What is the best etiquette for doing that? Is there any systematic procedure to be taken for improving the quality of answers?

Another issue here is someone that searching for an answer, in case that we post an updated answer to the question, it might not get any upvotes, then, the user probably chose the one with a high number of upvotes (considering that it's peer reviewed).

Source Link
user210003
user210003

What is the best practice 'etiquette' to tell an answer is outdated and should be updated

According to changes in technologies, many answers were outdated, however, these answers were very good for tha past, they might be also useful for same cases, but not for most, an example is depreciated mysql extension that replaced with mysqli, and older PHP date time function that newer (PHP date time class) should be used.

I am putting myself in a scenario: I do all my best to answer a question, my answer will be accepted and upvoted, but after one year, some one might write a comment and say:

This is bad answer, outdated

This is ethically right, notifying about outdated answer is not a bad-thing, but I am sure we can do this by another way, of which that not destruct the person. Considering that the answer were good for past. My aim in this discussion is to know what is the best etiquette for doing that? Is there any systematic procedure to taken for improving quality of answers?

Another issue here is someone that searching for an answer, in case that we post updated answer to the question, it might not get any upvote, then, user probably chose the one with high upvote (considering that its peer reviewed).