Skip to main content
Ease of reading edit. Stylized tech name.
Source Link
bad_coder
  • 28k
  • 8
  • 51
  • 132

Block Quote migration

I received strange "Commonmark"CommonMark migration" edits here:

  1. https://meta.stackexchange.com/posts/344867/revisions
  2. https://meta.stackexchange.com/posts/345953/revisions
  3. https://stackoverflow.com/posts/37844312/revisions

diff

Both quote whitespace formats appear to be valid CommonMark syntax, so I don't know why they were migrated in the first place.

The post-migration format is clearly worse as the quote marks no longer line up in plaintext.

https://spec.commonmark.org/0.12/#block-quote-marker

Block Quote migration

I received strange "Commonmark migration" edits here:

  1. https://meta.stackexchange.com/posts/344867/revisions
  2. https://meta.stackexchange.com/posts/345953/revisions
  3. https://stackoverflow.com/posts/37844312/revisions

diff

Both quote whitespace formats appear to be valid CommonMark syntax, so I don't know why they were migrated in the first place.

The post-migration format is clearly worse as the quote marks no longer line up in plaintext.

https://spec.commonmark.org/0.12/#block-quote-marker

Block Quote migration

I received strange "CommonMark migration" edits here:

  1. https://meta.stackexchange.com/posts/344867/revisions
  2. https://meta.stackexchange.com/posts/345953/revisions
  3. https://stackoverflow.com/posts/37844312/revisions

diff

Both quote whitespace formats appear to be valid CommonMark syntax, so I don't know why they were migrated in the first place.

The post-migration format is clearly worse as the quote marks no longer line up in plaintext.

https://spec.commonmark.org/0.12/#block-quote-marker

found one that happened on Stack Overflow... plus revert back to the actual [sic] edit comment on the edits.
Source Link
pkamb
  • 4.7k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 37

Block Quote migration

I received strange "CommonMark"Commonmark migration" edits here:

  1. https://meta.stackexchange.com/posts/344867/revisions
  2. https://meta.stackexchange.com/posts/345953/revisions
  3. https://stackoverflow.com/posts/37844312/revisions

diff

Both quote whitespace formats appear to be valid CommonMark syntax, so I don't know why they were migrated in the first place.

The post-migration format is clearly worse as the quote marks no longer line up in plaintext.

https://spec.commonmark.org/0.12/#block-quote-marker

Block Quote migration

I received strange "CommonMark migration" edits here:

  1. https://meta.stackexchange.com/posts/344867/revisions
  2. https://meta.stackexchange.com/posts/345953/revisions

diff

Both quote whitespace formats appear to be valid CommonMark syntax, so I don't know why they were migrated in the first place.

The post-migration format is clearly worse as the quote marks no longer line up in plaintext.

https://spec.commonmark.org/0.12/#block-quote-marker

Block Quote migration

I received strange "Commonmark migration" edits here:

  1. https://meta.stackexchange.com/posts/344867/revisions
  2. https://meta.stackexchange.com/posts/345953/revisions
  3. https://stackoverflow.com/posts/37844312/revisions

diff

Both quote whitespace formats appear to be valid CommonMark syntax, so I don't know why they were migrated in the first place.

The post-migration format is clearly worse as the quote marks no longer line up in plaintext.

https://spec.commonmark.org/0.12/#block-quote-marker

Active reading [<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markdown#CommonMark>].
Source Link

Block Quote migration

I received strange "Commonmark"CommonMark migration" edits here:

  1. https://meta.stackexchange.com/posts/344867/revisions
  2. https://meta.stackexchange.com/posts/345953/revisions

diff

Both quote whitespace formats appear to be valid CommonMark syntax, so I don't know why they were migrated in the first place.

The post-migration format is clearly worse as the quote marks no longer line up in plaintext.

https://spec.commonmark.org/0.12/#block-quote-marker

Block Quote migration

I received strange "Commonmark migration" edits here:

  1. https://meta.stackexchange.com/posts/344867/revisions
  2. https://meta.stackexchange.com/posts/345953/revisions

diff

Both quote whitespace formats appear to be valid CommonMark syntax, so I don't know why they were migrated in the first place.

The post-migration format is clearly worse as the quote marks no longer line up in plaintext.

https://spec.commonmark.org/0.12/#block-quote-marker

Block Quote migration

I received strange "CommonMark migration" edits here:

  1. https://meta.stackexchange.com/posts/344867/revisions
  2. https://meta.stackexchange.com/posts/345953/revisions

diff

Both quote whitespace formats appear to be valid CommonMark syntax, so I don't know why they were migrated in the first place.

The post-migration format is clearly worse as the quote marks no longer line up in plaintext.

https://spec.commonmark.org/0.12/#block-quote-marker

deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
Ham Vocke StaffMod
  • 12.2k
  • 7
  • 20
  • 26
Loading
added 24 characters in body
Source Link
Ham Vocke StaffMod
  • 12.2k
  • 7
  • 20
  • 26
Loading
added 147 characters in body
Source Link
pkamb
  • 4.7k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 37
Loading
Source Link
pkamb
  • 4.7k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 37
Loading