Skip to main content
Post Reopened by Kip, Stefano Borini, mmyers
Post Closed as "not constructive" by Welbog, Peter Ajtai, Brandon, Ladybug Killer, fretje
edited tags
Link
Stefano Borini
  • 4k
  • 2
  • 22
  • 27
grammar
Source Link
Welbog
  • 26.4k
  • 8
  • 60
  • 115

stackoverflow Stack Overflow redesign  ?

If there's something that requires no more proof and verification, it is how Jin is incredibly awesome beyond any level of human understanding when it comes to design. So the questions goes...is, can we expect a bit of nice eye-candy candy on SO as well ? please please ? pretty please ? With sugar on top ?

Sometimes, the rude programmer enjoys a bit of comfort.

stackoverflow redesign  ?

If there's something that requires no more proof and verification, is how Jin is incredibly awesome beyond any level of human understanding when it comes to design. So the questions goes... can we expect a bit of nice eye-candy on SO as well ? please please ? pretty please ? With sugar on top ?

Sometimes, the rude programmer enjoys a bit of comfort.

Stack Overflow redesign?

If there's something that requires no more proof and verification, it is how Jin is incredibly awesome beyond any level of human understanding when it comes to design. So the questions is, can we expect a bit of nice eye candy on SO as well?

Sometimes the rude programmer enjoys a bit of comfort.

Source Link
Stefano Borini
  • 4k
  • 2
  • 22
  • 27

stackoverflow redesign ?

If there's something that requires no more proof and verification, is how Jin is incredibly awesome beyond any level of human understanding when it comes to design. So the questions goes... can we expect a bit of nice eye-candy on SO as well ? please please ? pretty please ? With sugar on top ?

Sometimes, the rude programmer enjoys a bit of comfort.