Skip to main content
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Source Link

Is there any recourse to being down-voted when your answer is valid, correct, previously voted-up but just now becomes out of date because, for example, some ruby gem has been updated and completely changed?

Seems immoral to start voting down because of changes made over time. How can every answer be expected to be managed - a comment is surely suffice?

I almost feel that when downvoting, a small message/warning about it's general extremity should be noted in that orange box.

Here's my now 0 scoring answer, which was perfectly valid and I even had tried to keep this one up to date on one occasion, up to a few months ago - CoffeeScript on Windows?CoffeeScript on Windows?

Is there any recourse to being down-voted when your answer is valid, correct, previously voted-up but just now becomes out of date because, for example, some ruby gem has been updated and completely changed?

Seems immoral to start voting down because of changes made over time. How can every answer be expected to be managed - a comment is surely suffice?

I almost feel that when downvoting, a small message/warning about it's general extremity should be noted in that orange box.

Here's my now 0 scoring answer, which was perfectly valid and I even had tried to keep this one up to date on one occasion, up to a few months ago - CoffeeScript on Windows?

Is there any recourse to being down-voted when your answer is valid, correct, previously voted-up but just now becomes out of date because, for example, some ruby gem has been updated and completely changed?

Seems immoral to start voting down because of changes made over time. How can every answer be expected to be managed - a comment is surely suffice?

I almost feel that when downvoting, a small message/warning about it's general extremity should be noted in that orange box.

Here's my now 0 scoring answer, which was perfectly valid and I even had tried to keep this one up to date on one occasion, up to a few months ago - CoffeeScript on Windows?

Source Link
PandaWood
  • 228
  • 1
  • 5

My answer down-voted because it had just (recently) become out of date

Is there any recourse to being down-voted when your answer is valid, correct, previously voted-up but just now becomes out of date because, for example, some ruby gem has been updated and completely changed?

Seems immoral to start voting down because of changes made over time. How can every answer be expected to be managed - a comment is surely suffice?

I almost feel that when downvoting, a small message/warning about it's general extremity should be noted in that orange box.

Here's my now 0 scoring answer, which was perfectly valid and I even had tried to keep this one up to date on one occasion, up to a few months ago - CoffeeScript on Windows?