Timeline for Allow spectators to see vote tallies in primaries
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2020 at 13:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 13:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 9:16 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| S Feb 8, 2014 at 5:32 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Feb 8, 2014 at 5:32 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| S Jan 31, 2014 at 4:17 | history | bounty started | Undo | ||
| S Jan 31, 2014 at 4:17 | history | notice added | Undo | Draw attention | |
| Jan 26, 2011 at 19:14 | comment | added | Brian | +1. I'm not sure if I think showing vote tallies during the primaries are a good idea, but they I do think showing spectators the same information as voters is a good idea. That being said, the people who have less than 150 reputation are either in the penalty box or are not active enough on the site for this information to hold that much importance. | |
| Jan 25, 2011 at 22:54 | history | edited | user149432 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Link to related request
|
| Jan 25, 2011 at 22:47 | comment | added | badp | @ALLCAPS meta.stackexchange.com/questions/76412/… | |
| Jan 25, 2011 at 22:46 | comment | added | Linus Kleen | @ALLCAPS How does your ice cream metaphor relate to the current practice of hiding votes to non-eligibles and showing them to those that can vote? | |
| Jan 25, 2011 at 22:37 | comment | added | user149432 | @ALLCAPS again, I'm not starting a thing about whether tallies should be shown in general. I know it's easy to get tripped up on a request when there are a whole 5 lines to read, but I'm asking for people not voting (and thus, not being skewed by the tallies simpliciter) to be able to observe. | |
| Jan 25, 2011 at 22:35 | history | edited | user149432 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Clarify the request
|
| Jan 25, 2011 at 22:34 | comment | added | Welbog | It's like an ice cream headache. Ice cream is fantastic. It's creamy and delicious and full of little bits of things you like to eat like Oreos. Oreos are the king of cookies with respect to ice cream (Oreo haters, you can just go die). But if you eat too much ice cream your head freezes solid and you can't talk let alone eat any more ice cream. Don't let ice cream ruin your ice cream. Don't let election results ruin your election. (Don't let Mark Trapp ruin the your election, either. I heard he hates Oreos.) | |
| Jan 25, 2011 at 22:33 | comment | added | user149432 | @ALLCAPS I'm not here to start a thing about whether voters are allowed to see running tallies; I'm just requesting spectators get the same information voters get now. | |
| Jan 25, 2011 at 22:32 | comment | added | user149432 | @badp blind voting? Or do you see vote tallies as a spectator now, and I'm just not seeing it? | |
| Jan 25, 2011 at 22:32 | comment | added | Welbog | Being able to see the partial results of an election can skew the final results of the election. You must not allow the results of an election to ruin the results of an election. | |
| Jan 25, 2011 at 22:28 | comment | added | badp | Funny, I was about to make the opposite suggestion :) | |
| Jan 25, 2011 at 22:27 | history | asked | user149432 | CC BY-SA 2.5 |