7

This post was locked (reasons are not needed for this post):

enter image description here

My comment is about the link "visit meta". That isn't especially helpful as we are on Meta.SE, the site it redirects us to.

Should this link be changed or removed?

2
  • Well, if we want to be super picky it can say "For more info click here" when on MSE itself but... it's really too minor to be worth the development time. Commented Apr 2, 2015 at 20:58
  • 2
    Meta is its own Meta apparently :D related: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/173624/…
    – nicael
    Commented Apr 2, 2015 at 21:02

2 Answers 2

12

Where else are you supposed to discuss this stuff? There's no meta-meta; if there was, this question would be there, and it clearly isn't.

...or is it?

6
  • 2
    Perhaps it should be migrated, then?
    – jscs
    Commented Apr 2, 2015 at 20:42
  • 3
    At least have meta.meta.stackexchange.com be an alternate url for meta.stackexchange.com (and repeat to a depth of like 3 or 4 or something).
    – Servy
    Commented Apr 2, 2015 at 20:45
  • 2
    @Servy feature-request time? :P
    – Tim
    Commented Apr 2, 2015 at 20:46
  • 1
    @Servy if we get meta.meta.stackexchange.com, it should be added to migration targets over here, shouldn't it. Closing>Off-Topic>Migration>belongs on meta.meta.stackexchange.com
    – gnat
    Commented Apr 2, 2015 at 21:13
  • 1
    @gnat I asked for it specifically so that I could comment on questions saying, "belongs on meta.meta.stackoverflow instead" just to mess with people.
    – Servy
    Commented Apr 3, 2015 at 14:13
  • @Servy comment is not enough: "vote to close it immediately..."
    – gnat
    Commented Apr 3, 2015 at 14:17
7

No, the link goes to the correct place.

Meta is its own Meta.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .