Can we please pay more attention to link-fixing suggested edits?

Question

This edit suggestion was approved by a user with 44K reputation. If he had clicked the link, he would have realised that the link actually led to a pornographic site.

The suggested edit was done by a user who has since been banned for posting the same link in an answer of his own, on the same question.

This obviously shows that this user was not paying attention to the suggested edit and just clicked "Approve".

So yea, can we all just be aware that stuff like this happens, and we really should look closely at suggested edits. I understand that an average user probably can't tell whether a link was actually improved, if they have no experience in that topic, so then they should at least skip the review. But as this link was blatantly pornography, this shouldn't be a hard one.

Answer 1

EDIT: Maybe we could add in a new review type, a link changing review type. Also, maybe one thing that the devs could add is a tooltip showing where URL shortening links lead.

This is the very purpose of review audits. For those who don't know, if I understand correctly, review audits are fake audits generated that are blatantly obvious rejects, and if a user approves them, they are greeted with a very angry message. While edits like this will get posted and approved, we can just hope that the rest of the community is observant enough to stop these edits, and roll them back to previous states. Also, the topic of Banning URL Shorteners has been brought up many times, and declined.

Also, in this case, the edit was removed, so the system works, although there may be a few edge cases of people approving blatantly wrong things, but given time, bad posts will work their way to oblivion.