8

In the Stack Exchange, Inc. API Terms of Use page, the first paragraph has a word with a spelling mistake.

The word programmatically is displayed as programatically (with single m).

... a set of programming interfaces which allow you to programatically query and connect to the Stack Exchange Network. ...

Improve this question
4

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
6

This will be fixed in the next build (rev 2018.5.29.30545).

Thanks to the comments, the commit message for this fix was a no-brainer:

commit message

Improve this answer
12
  • 1
    Steak! I'm hungry.
    – Shadow Wizard
    Commented May 29, 2018 at 11:37
  • Wait... what happened to revisions 30534 and 30535? It's only 30533 now...
    – Shadow Wizard
    Commented May 29, 2018 at 11:38
  • We do not talk about 20534 and 30535. (Also, my guess would be they don't deploy every build?)
    – Journeyman Geek
    Commented May 29, 2018 at 11:42
  • @Journeyman oh, bad builds. They should be indeed left alone, never to be mentioned. ;-) (that said, who says 30536 won't be a bad build too?)
    – Shadow Wizard
    Commented May 29, 2018 at 11:56
  • There are some other gramar misteak in API documentation
    – Arulkumar
    Commented May 29, 2018 at 11:58
  • @Arulkumar yeah, I've fixed those too (in the same commit), just needs a build
    – m0sa
    Commented May 29, 2018 at 12:07
  • @m0sa Oh, great.
    – Arulkumar
    Commented May 29, 2018 at 12:08
  • @ShadowWizard the last number in the build revision is propagated from the first build in our build chain (our Dev environment). So we get an incremented number every time a dev build runs / triggers (by one or more commits).
    – m0sa
    Commented May 29, 2018 at 12:12
  • @m0sa makes sense! So it means you can't really predict the final number that will actually go live... no?
    – Shadow Wizard
    Commented May 29, 2018 at 12:14
  • exactly, but I can give you a number, and if you see a it, or a greater one, it means the fix is deployed
    – m0sa
    Commented May 29, 2018 at 12:15
  • Well, it's done. Time to status-completed the question, no? :)
    – Shadow Wizard
    Commented May 29, 2018 at 14:49
  • whilst you're there would you mind looking at these ones too? :)
    – ᔕᖺᘎᕊ
    Commented May 29, 2018 at 17:42

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .