5

This question already has an answer here:

Is it not time to implement a mobile version of the site?

pros:

  • browsing experience
  • greater availability
  • more traffic

cons:

  • txtspeak answers
  • fewer ad impressions

marked as duplicate by Aziz Shaikh, Shadow The Coffee Wizard discussion Aug 26 '14 at 13:03

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • -fewer ad impressions, -txtspeak answers – Shog9 Oct 18 '10 at 20:18
  • @Shog9, the URL looks a lot like meta.stackoverflow.com. Oh... – Pops Oct 18 '10 at 20:43
  • @Pop: roflz wut – Shog9 Oct 18 '10 at 20:56
  • @Simon Brown definetly the same request, definetly not a duplicate. + I'm trying to create a list to give a better overview @Shog9 added – Artificial Oct 18 '10 at 20:57
5

Two mobile projects are already out there using the Stack API (links are to StackApps project page):

Both use the Stack API, which is currently read-only, so no asking/answering/voting is currently possible.

Yes, I'd support a full mobile app as you suggest, but hopefully these will tide you over.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .