Skip to main content
6 of 7
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/

I don't agree with the decision on this question.

Every big site complains about not having enough good questions:

And here's the one that inspired me to write this answer:

We get too many crap questions on these sites because our best, brightest users don't ask any, or very few, good questions. Jon Skeet (34/31,418); Darin Dimitrov (35/20,819); Hans Passant (2/14,831); etc. etc. etc. I find this very hard to believe that our best users never have good questions, or things they need to look up....

#We should have badges that inspire our very excellent community to increase the signal of our signal-to-noise ratio.

But I think that the badges listed by Jon Ericson in the original post aren't good enough. A score of 1 or more is not enough. These badges should be tied to one of:

  1. A higher threshold for counting for the badge. Perhaps n questions with 3 or more votes, 5 or more, etc.
  2. Having more answers than questions. Perhaps badges like:
  • Student - Bronze - Asked first question and answered one (or two?) questions with each scoring of 1 or more
  • Sophomore - Silver - Asked 10 questions and answered 10 (or 20?) questions with each scoring of 1 or more
  • Socrates - Gold - Asked 50 questions and answered 50 (or 100?) questions with each scoring 1 or more
  • These wouldn't have to be self answers, just ensure that the user isn't simply being a help vampire. Though they would be allowed to be self answers.
  1. Some combination of 1 and 2. The numbers could be played with.
durron597
  • 11.7k
  • 1
  • 42
  • 69