I don't agree with the status-declined decision on this question.
Every big site complains about not having enough good questions:
- Meta Stack Exchange
- StackOverflow
- SuperUser
- Programmers
And here's the one that inspired me to write this answer:
- Server Fault
We get too many crap questions on these sites because our best, brightest users don't ask any, or very few, good questions. Jon Skeet (34/31,418); Darin Dimitrov (35/20,819); Hans Passant (2/14,831); etc. etc. etc. I find this very hard to believe that our best users never have good questions, or things they need to look up....
#We should have badges that inspire our very excellent community to increase the signal of our signal-to-noise ratio.
But I think that the badges listed by Jon Ericson in the original post aren't good enough. A score of 1 or more is not enough. These badges should be tied to one of:
- A higher threshold for counting for the badge. Perhaps
n
questions with 3 or more votes, 5 or more, etc. - Having more answers than questions. Perhaps badges like:
- Student - Bronze - Asked first question and answered one (or two?) questions with each scoring of 1 or more
- Sophomore - Silver - Asked 10 questions and answered 10 (or 20?) questions with each scoring of 1 or more
- Socrates - Gold - Asked 50 questions and answered 50 (or 100?) questions with each scoring 1 or more
- These wouldn't have to be self answers, just ensure that the user isn't simply being a help vampire. Though they would be allowed to be self answers.
- Some combination of 1 and 2. The numbers could be played with.