Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with feature-request
Search options not deleted
user 156235
Proposals for new features on the Stack Exchange network, or requests for a change to an existing feature. On posts tagged feature-request, voting may indicate agreement or disagreement with the proposed change, in addition to the quality or usefulness of the post itself. Feature requests are not brought to the company's attention until and unless a [status-review] tag is added by a moderator or employee.
1
vote
3
answers
100
views
When to vote-up guide and vote/reputation allocation algorithm/question acceptance
Hi, I'm not clear on correct SO etiquette--especially WRT when to vote-up. Here is a scenario: I asked a question. Two people responded with answers, and there was plenty of comments/discussion. T …
1
vote
When to vote-up guide and vote/reputation allocation algorithm/question acceptance
All the info is in here. Thanks Pollyanna for pointing that out in the comments.
0
votes
Awarding upvotes (giver/taker ratio)
I don't agree with the suggestion/question. There are many different ways to interact with SO--questions, answers, comments, votes... It is unreasonable to suggest that a certain balance of answers/ …