Timeline for Categories other than "off-topic" should allow custom close reasons
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
50 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2020 at 19:32 | comment | added | user313042 | @SonictheStay-HomeHedgehog Yes, but it's also clearly very uncommon. Thanks for the comment, though, it did not occur to me to check that. | |
| Jun 1, 2020 at 19:26 | comment | added | Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog | @Brahadeesh It's also worth noting that there is precedent for applying these tags at the same time. | |
| Jun 1, 2020 at 19:22 | comment | added | animuson StaffMod | @Brahadeesh Because we are not going to make this possible for other close reasons, but have since renamed "off-topic" to "community-specific reason" which makes the request somewhat moot. | |
| Jun 1, 2020 at 19:20 | comment | added | user313042 | @animuson I'm a little confused, what's the reason for the tags status-completed as well as status-declined to be added? Isn't that kind of contradictory? | |
| Jun 1, 2020 at 19:10 | history | edited | animusonStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
| S Dec 13, 2018 at 5:02 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Dec 13, 2018 at 5:02 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Dec 11, 2018 at 20:59 | answer | added | Monica Cellio | timeline score: 4 | |
| S Dec 5, 2018 at 3:16 | history | bounty started | Michael Hampton | ||
| S Dec 5, 2018 at 3:16 | history | notice added | Michael Hampton | Canonical answer required | |
| S Feb 4, 2018 at 19:11 | history | bounty ended | Michael Hampton | ||
| S Feb 4, 2018 at 19:11 | history | notice removed | Michael Hampton | ||
| S Jan 28, 2018 at 18:54 | history | bounty started | Michael Hampton | ||
| S Jan 28, 2018 at 18:54 | history | notice added | Michael Hampton | Draw attention | |
| Oct 13, 2017 at 18:05 | comment | added | quid | Related request on Mathematics. | |
| May 23, 2017 at 12:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| May 20, 2016 at 20:53 | answer | added | Luis Masuelli | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 30, 2016 at 0:03 | comment | added | Michael Hampton | @MatthewRead Just how long would it take to go through all of them? Why is this too long? | |
| Apr 30, 2016 at 0:00 | comment | added | user154510 | It seems like this would mostly serve to make it harder to find the custom reason you're looking for. People already get confused between unclear vs. too broad, and so on. | |
| S Oct 6, 2015 at 18:35 | history | bounty ended | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | ||
| S Oct 6, 2015 at 18:35 | history | notice removed | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | ||
| S Oct 2, 2015 at 2:52 | history | suggested | Nathan Tuggy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added tags; clarified title; some copyediting
|
| Oct 2, 2015 at 1:48 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 2, 2015 at 2:52 | |||||
| Oct 1, 2015 at 23:52 | answer | added | Nathan Tuggy | timeline score: 30 | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 22:47 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | @NathanTuggy For a feature request, I guess canonical would mean coming from SE. Keep in mind bounties on MSE are often more to show that someone cares (for all the good it does) than about getting answers. | |
| Oct 1, 2015 at 22:44 | comment | added | Nathan Tuggy | @Gilles: Can you clarify what sort of canonical answer you're looking for with the bounty? | |
| S Sep 30, 2015 at 0:42 | history | bounty started | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | ||
| S Sep 30, 2015 at 0:42 | history | notice added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | Canonical answer required | |
| S May 23, 2015 at 2:02 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S May 23, 2015 at 2:02 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| May 15, 2015 at 2:32 | comment | added | jscs | Related discussion in the comments at Shouldn't "off topic" be only about...off topic? | |
| S May 15, 2015 at 1:02 | history | bounty started | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | ||
| S May 15, 2015 at 1:02 | history | notice added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | Canonical answer required | |
| May 15, 2015 at 1:02 | comment | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | Requested on Software Recommendations | |
| May 13, 2015 at 16:36 | answer | added | Catija | timeline score: 30 | |
| S Apr 18, 2015 at 1:01 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Apr 18, 2015 at 1:01 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Apr 10, 2015 at 0:15 | comment | added | random | "out of scope" fits better since they may be about the topic matter, but not the case of questions allowed | |
| Apr 10, 2015 at 0:14 | history | edited | Michael Hampton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Updated example close reason
|
| S Apr 9, 2015 at 23:46 | history | bounty started | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | ||
| S Apr 9, 2015 at 23:46 | history | notice added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | Canonical answer required | |
| Dec 6, 2013 at 2:11 | comment | added | doppelgreener | @Michael I did some editing to make it clearer what's going on, and changed the title, since I think "All close reasons should be customizable" is prone to misinterpretation. (Our close reasons are already completely customisable, of course - we can close a question for any custom reason we want; see random's comment.) Please check the the changes I made to make sure this post is still saying what you want it to say. | |
| Dec 6, 2013 at 2:10 | history | edited | doppelgreener | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Small rewrite to make it clearer what's going on
|
| Dec 6, 2013 at 0:47 | comment | added | doppelgreener | @Michael Go right ahead :) | |
| Dec 6, 2013 at 0:47 | history | edited | Michael Hampton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 84 characters in body
|
| Dec 6, 2013 at 0:45 | comment | added | doppelgreener | @Michael Do you mean that a close reason that would typically look like this should instead look more like this, by being made a child of "primarily opinion-based" rather than "off topic"? (I made that mockup just from copying some of the opinion-based closure text) | |
| Dec 6, 2013 at 0:02 | comment | added | random Mod | "Other (add a comment explaining what is wrong)" not doing it for you? | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 23:40 | comment | added | Michael Hampton | You could call that too broad, or leave it in off-topic. I think that's better left for a future discussion, once this proposed feature exists. | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 23:37 | comment | added | Ken White | Agree with the first example, disagree with the second. (IMO, there's typically a clear difference between an unclear question and a question that shows no effort - no attempted solution, explanation of why it didn't work, and no indication of the results expected.) | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 23:23 | history | asked | Michael Hampton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
