Timeline for Was Monica's firing intended to "disrupt the status quo"? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
37 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2021 at 21:21 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| May 12, 2021 at 1:09 | |||||
| Apr 16, 2020 at 16:20 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Apr 16, 2020 at 20:24 | |||||
| Mar 5, 2020 at 8:00 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Mar 5, 2020 at 15:11 | |||||
| Feb 11, 2020 at 12:25 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Feb 12, 2020 at 19:00 | |||||
| Jan 15, 2020 at 14:20 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Jan 15, 2020 at 20:58 | |||||
| Jan 15, 2020 at 14:03 | history | edited | gnat |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 23, 2019 at 17:35 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Nov 23, 2019 at 18:55 | |||||
| Nov 23, 2019 at 6:31 | history | closed |
tchrist Robert Longson Rob Stormblessed Pierre.Vriens |
Opinion-based | |
| Nov 23, 2019 at 3:25 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 23, 2019 at 6:31 | |||||
| S Nov 14, 2019 at 14:53 | history | bounty ended | gnat | ||
| S Nov 14, 2019 at 14:53 | history | notice removed | gnat | ||
| S Nov 10, 2019 at 9:50 | history | bounty started | gnat | ||
| S Nov 10, 2019 at 9:50 | history | notice added | gnat | Authoritative reference needed | |
| Oct 28, 2019 at 10:19 | comment | added | Script47 | @DeNovo recent actions have made it very clear that training in working with is very much required. | |
| Oct 25, 2019 at 20:43 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Oct 26, 2019 at 0:16 | |||||
| Oct 25, 2019 at 0:56 | history | undeleted |
Undo ArtOfCode Cody Gray Journeyman Geek Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog |
||
| Oct 24, 2019 at 21:44 | history | deleted | CommunityBot | User 637362 destroyed | |
| Oct 24, 2019 at 20:19 | history | edited | user637362 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 156 characters in body
|
| S Oct 24, 2019 at 18:39 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixing typos
|
| Oct 24, 2019 at 18:20 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 24, 2019 at 18:39 | |||||
| Oct 24, 2019 at 17:08 | history | reopened |
Script47 Robert Columbia Zoe - Save the data dump user437611 Suvitruf - Andrei Apanasik |
||
| Oct 24, 2019 at 16:59 | comment | added | De Novo | @Script47 I would expect Sara did respond re: the positive things about SE, but the transcript ends with the host's statement. If not, it sounds like some training in working with the media would be helpful. | |
| Oct 24, 2019 at 16:31 | answer | added | PoorYorick | timeline score: 65 | |
| Oct 24, 2019 at 16:30 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Oct 24, 2019 at 16:42 | |||||
| Oct 24, 2019 at 16:19 | comment | added | Ian Ringrose | There are many mod who would have been a much more effective choose if a CH (or their boss) was planning someone to fire so as to get a message across. Hence I don't believe the firing was done to change the status status que. | |
| Oct 24, 2019 at 16:15 | comment | added | ColeValleyGirl | And @shog9 pithily beat me to it. | |
| Oct 24, 2019 at 16:14 | comment | added | ColeValleyGirl | @eyeballfrog '"White feminism" has been a thing since way back -- see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_feminism -- essentially the way feminism since the fights for women's suffrage until at least the 80s and most often beyond has focused on what white (middle-class) women know and care about assuming that all women were like them and not taking into account that other women have different experiences and priorities. 'White feminism' is a criticism of the assumption that one of a few women can speak for all women. | |
| Oct 24, 2019 at 16:12 | comment | added | Shog9 | White Feminism on Wikipedia - yes, it's a thing. | |
| Oct 24, 2019 at 16:11 | history | closed |
πάντα ῥεῖ hat yagmoth555 doppelgreener HDE 226868 |
Opinion-based | |
| Oct 24, 2019 at 16:10 | comment | added | DK Bose | "White feminism?" that's new to me as well. | |
| Oct 24, 2019 at 16:05 | comment | added | Script47 | When the host said: 'I don't say much positive about Stack Overflow [...]' then any person who claims to represent the organization would've questioned 'why'. I, as a "normal" user, frequently hold people up when they misunderstand how Stack Overflow is supposed to work and as a result have a "bad" experience. SO has helped millions of people and is the probably the go-to resource for programming issues. | |
| Oct 24, 2019 at 16:02 | comment | added | Script47 | Monica was discussed (maybe not in name) elsewhere too? | |
| Oct 24, 2019 at 16:01 | comment | added | doppelgreener | This is just tossing a new lit match into the issue. The titular question isn't even substantiated. | |
| Oct 24, 2019 at 16:00 | comment | added | De Novo | @KateGregory I'm out of votes, but I agree 100%. I think the idea that anyone in management was maliciously disruptive doesn't make sense, and I see no support for that here. Certainly Sara's actions with regard to Monica weren't fair or or effective, and created real challenges for the desired outcome, but I don't think that was the intent. | |
| Oct 24, 2019 at 15:58 | history | edited | user637362 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 29 characters in body; edited title
|
| Oct 24, 2019 at 15:57 | comment | added | Kate Gregory | "Not just deciding for yourself what you think is nice, but asking affected people what would be nice" is entirely different from "choosing deliberately not to be nice." I interpret "not in a way that we think is the nice way to do it" as the first of these: it seems you interpret it closer to the second. While Kim's podcast may be called "cause a scene", that hardly suggests appearing on it proves Sara just wanted to provoke or disrupt. | |
| Oct 24, 2019 at 15:54 | history | asked | user637362 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |