19

Most things in chat are rate-limited, however edits are not. Each new edit to a post pings a user. Here's an autohotkey script:

Loop 100
{
  Send {Up}!{Enter}
}

Shouldn't edits be rate-limited too? Or pings from the same post limited in some way?

11
  • 8
    I saw the title and thought this was a brag post or something. Funny. Commented Feb 15, 2013 at 14:26
  • I would personally prefer if an edit would not repeat the ping, but that suggestion is now my most-downvoted post on MSO, so I'm in the minority there. Commented Feb 15, 2013 at 14:26
  • @LittleBobbyTables Ninja-brag-post
    – fredley
    Commented Feb 15, 2013 at 14:26
  • My initial thought is that the whole "You only can edit for 2 minutes" is kinda meant as an alternative to a rate limit but that does little to the whole point within those 2 minutes.
    – Grace Note StaffMod
    Commented Feb 15, 2013 at 14:27
  • 5
    Oh god no. If we're going to do anything just limit how many times a message can ping, say, no pings after the second edit. Chat's message rate limit is annoying enough
    – Zelda
    Commented Feb 15, 2013 at 14:28
  • Indeed.
    – Tim Stone
    Commented Feb 15, 2013 at 14:29
  • @TimStone Indeed
    – fredley
    Commented Feb 15, 2013 at 14:30
  • 6
    This is why we can't have nice things. Actually, I think the entire Bridge is why we can't have nice things.
    – mmyers
    Commented Feb 15, 2013 at 15:29
  • Aww. We're only a little crazy, I swear!
    – fbueckert
    Commented Feb 15, 2013 at 15:30
  • @fbueckert Crazy is a relative thing.
    – fredley
    Commented Feb 15, 2013 at 15:31
  • 2
    why @fredley whhhhyyyyyyyyyyy
    – Flyk
    Commented Feb 15, 2013 at 20:16

1 Answer 1

10

Building currently; now with even more throttling :)

6
  • 1
    I hope it's a more sane limit than the one message per second limit?
    – Zelda
    Commented Feb 15, 2013 at 15:18
  • @Ben and what would you define as "sane" here? If you're editing more than one a second, you're doing something wrong... Commented Feb 15, 2013 at 15:19
  • 3
    @BenBrocka I agree. The 1-message per second throttle should only kick in after the second message IMO, so I can do things like look at this: \ [oneboxlink]
    – fredley
    Commented Feb 15, 2013 at 15:19
  • @fredley as a more global tweak to throttling, that could indeed probably work Commented Feb 15, 2013 at 15:20
  • @MarcGravell brb, asking new question
    – fredley
    Commented Feb 15, 2013 at 15:20
  • meta.stackexchange.com/q/167747/150214
    – fredley
    Commented Feb 15, 2013 at 15:24

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .