I want to know clearly, if diversity in the working standard of good and bad conduct across different sites should be flexibly allowed or if we should have the same standard of defining good and bad conduct and ethos culture across platforms. Yes or no? I'm being neither sarcastic nor snide.
I go to one site, they want quick, curt answers. Another site uses longer sentences, complains about curt answers, and orbits the topic at a distance that wouldn't be accepted elsewhere. I've personally noticed this between ELU vs SO, SF, and UL. Users on the dev sites generally all tend to recognize not reading questions carefully and answering in threads, but no on ELU.
What should I expect from other sites? Personally, I'm in favor of giving ELU and other sites a longer leash, but I want to know what the community thinks about this? We're all different.
I'm new. This is my first question. I've asked this many different ways. Would someone please tell me directly, whether different interpretations of conduct should be tolerated across network sites?