Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with stack-overflow
Search options not deleted
user 166277
USING THIS TAG IS NOT THE SAME THING AS ASKING ON STACK OVERFLOW. YOU ARE ON META STACK EXCHANGE, WHERE MOST PROGRAMMING QUESTIONS ARE OFF-TOPIC. Questions specific to stackoverflow.com should be asked on meta.stackoverflow.com; such questions will be closed here. This is for questions about the Stack Overflow site that still relate to the SE network as a whole. Questions about Stack Overflow (the company) should be tagged [company] instead.
1
vote
Make junit4 a synonym of junit
I propose to either:
A) do nothing as I can't decide JUnit should be better off as a synonym for JUnit3 or JUnit4 (newer isn't always right, otherwise Windows 8 would be a synonym for Windows)
B) b …
- 718
1
vote
Are questions with subjective answers such a bad thing?
The question and answers are definitely not that outdated since it's a community wiki and people are free to modify the existing content. (just sort by active)
The real problem is that like questions …
- 718
3
votes
Need for arml tag for future
Questions are retagged all the time, so there is no need to reserve a tag for the future. It is always there when you need it.
- 718