17

I have a kind of relatively high number for "people reached" (3.5 million) on my Stack Overflow account and I'm just kind of wondering what that really means. Is it the sum of the view counters on all my questions and pages where I had highly upvoted answers? Does it account for duplicates, i.e., if the same person visited 3 of my questions would that count as 3 people or 1 person?

It's really cool to imagine that 3.5 million people have looked at something I wrote, but I'm just wondering what that really means. How much of that is automated crawlers?

16

It's fairly accurate. There's no exact science to this but the vast majority of crawlers won't influence the number. The logic used is very similar to tracking actual visits to the site for participation-based badges.

And when I say vast majority of crawlers, I'm leaving room for academic settings where a crawler fetches a set of links, and then humans go through them and create metadata based on what they see, or other such settings where we end up firing a visit for non-typical behavior.

If anything, the reached indicator is probably more on the conservative side than anything. You can go through 5 or 6 results in the top 10 of searches in way under the amount of time that would actually register (depending on how aggressively you close tabs).

The effect does tend to snowball as people find pages with posts you wrote and spend a little time on them, because that's a key metric for two things:

  1. We register the visit
  2. Google notices that people spend time on that particular page, and gives it more weight

So, while the number of people you've reached is a rough aggregate estimate, some contributions you've written can disproportionately influence that number and that's .. essentially what we'd expect. Some of my best answers are on posts that kind of languish in obscurity and there's just no great way to solve for that in such a generic indicator.

But overall, yes - it's a number that's probably way more understated than overstated, and something you should feel pretty good about. Jay Hanlon and Oded Coster invested a huge amount of time in it just so folks got a better sense of their net impact on people's day-to-day lives, so, enjoy it :)

  • 3
    I really appreciate that feature, it means a lot to me. Give them my thanks. – temporary_user_name Aug 16 at 18:56
  • 3
    Aww, shucks!! You're VERY welcome! :) And the real point is to thank YOU - we wanted a way to provide perspective on just how many people benefit from the time you donate here. – Jaydles Aug 19 at 20:03

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .